Modeling of the system of management of Educational process as a basis for improving the quality of mathematical and natural education in secondary education institutions

Details
Category: Uncategorised

Urgency of the research. Technological progress, the processes of globalization, including in education, cause constant changes in the requirements for the quality of education of students - future professionals in the labour market. The conformity of education to the modern development of society is an important component of the sovereignty of the state, the basis of its national security.

Target setting. Analysis of research on the reasons for the lack of significant results in ensuring the quality of mathematics and science education in the implementation of educational reforms showed that the management system of educational processes was not paid enough attention.

Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. Many scientists are engaged in improving the quality of education, management of educational institutions in Ukraine, among who, in particular, L. Danilenko, G. Dmytrenko, T. Yelnikova, L. Karamushka, Т. Lukina, O. Lyashenko and others. Programs for the development of education in European countries are also of great benefit for researchers.

The research objective. To develop a model of the system of management of educational process in a secondary education institution (scientific lyceum) as a basis for ensuring the quality of mathematics and science education.

The statement of basic materials. The author researches the management of educational processes. Author's developments on management of these processes are presented, as well as the model of “Conflict-free education” which give positive results in practice.

Conclusions. The use of practical methods of quality management of educational processes proposed in the work allows to improve the results of mathematical and natural education, to increase the motivation of students to learn.

Keywords: educational process, management of educational process, quality of mathematical and natural education, model of “Conflict-free education”.

 

References:

  1. Verhovna Rada Ukrayini, 2017. ‘Zakon Ukrayini “Pro osvitu” № 2145-VIII vid 05.09.2017 zi zminami (Law of Ukraine “On Education” № 2145-VIII of 05.09.2017 with changes)’. Dostupno: <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19> [Data zvernennya 21 Sichen 2020].
  2. Danilenko, LI 1998. ‘Modernizaciya zmistu, form i metodiv upravlinskoyi diyalnosti direktora zagalnoosvitnoyi shkoli (Modernization of the content, forms and methods of management of the director of secondary school)’. Monografiya, Kiyiv: Logos,. 140 s.
  3. Yelnikova, GV (red) 2015. ‘Adaptivne upravlinnya: prikladnij aspekt, poshirennya v osvitnij sistemi Ukrayini (Adaptive management: applied aspect, dissemination in the educational system of Ukraine)’. Kolektivna monografiya, Ternopil: Krok,  420 s.
  4. Zgurovskij, M 2006. ‘Doslidnicki universiteti: shans dlya Yevropi (Research universities: a chance for Europe)’. Dostupno: <https://dt.ua/EDUCATION/ doslidnitski_universiteti_shans_dlya_evropi> [Data zvernennya 10 Lyutij 2020].
  5. Kabinet Ministriv Ukrayini, 2019. ‘Postanova KMU “Pro zatverdzhennya Polozhennya pro naukovij licej ta naukovij licej-internat” № 438 vid 22 travnya 2019 r. (Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine "On approval of the Regulations on the scientific lyceum and scientific boarding lyceum" № 438 of May 22, 2019)’ Dostupno: <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/438-2019-%D0%BF?lang=en> [Data zvernennya 15 Sichen 2020].
  6. Lukina, T 2006. ‘Monitoring yakosti osviti: teoriya i praktika (Monitoring the quality of education: theory and practice)’, Kiyiv: Vid. dim “Shkilnij svit”; Vid-vo L. Galicina, 128 s.
  7. Lyashenko, OI, Lukina, TO, Bulah, IYe & Mruga, MR  ‘Metodika i tehnologiyi ocinyuvannya diyalnosti zagalnoosvitnogo navchalnogo zakladu (Methods and technologies for evaluating the activities of a secondary school)’. Posibnik, Kiyiv: Pedagogichna dumka, 160 s.
  8. Naukovo-doslidna laboratoriya eksperimentalnoyi pedagogiki ta pedagogichnih innovacij IPPO KUBG, 2014. ‘Rivneve navchannya ta rivnevo-stupeneve ocinyuvannya (eksperimentalna baza – Politehnichnij licej NTUU “KPI”, 2005-2013 rr.) (Level training and level-grade assessment (experimental base - Polytechnic Lyceum of NTUU“ KPI ”, 2005-2013))’. Dostupno: <http://ndl.ippo.kubg.edu.ua/?p=89> [Data zvernennya 10 Lyutij 2020].
  9. Osvitnij menedzhment (Educational Management), 2003, red. Danilenko, L & Karamushka, L, Kiyiv : Shkilnij svit, 400 s.
  10. Prezident Ukrayini, 2002. ‘Ukaz Prezidenta Ukrayini “Pro Nacionalnu doktrinu rozvitku osviti” vid 17.04.2002 (Decree of the President of Ukraine “On the National Doctrine of Education Development” of April 17, 2002)’. Dostupno: <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/347/2002> [Data zvernennya 04 Kviten 2020].
  11. Advancing Quality Cultures for Teacher Education in Europe: Tensions and Opportunities,   Ed. Hudson, B, Zgaga, P & Åstrand B, 301 p.
  12. Council of Europe, 2015. ‘Council of Europe’s vision for a quality education and its activities. Council of Europe activities on quality education’. Available at: <https://www.coe.int/en/web/ education/vision-for-a-quality-education> [Accessed 21 April 2020].
  13. European Commission, 2000. ‘Excerpt from European Report on the Quality of school Education Sixteen Quality indicators. Report based on the work of the Working Committee on Quality Indicators’, European Commission Directorate-General for Education and Culture, May, 2000. Available at: <http://ec.europa.eu/education/ policies/educ/indic/rapinen.pdf> [Accessed 15 April 2020].
  14. Publications Office of the EU, 2001. ‘European report on the quality of school education. Sixteen quality indicators’, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 82 p.
  15. Tjeldvoll, A (edited) 1998. ‘Education and the Scandinavian welfare state in the year 2000: equality, policy, and reform’, Publisher:Routledge, 380 p