Select your language
Select your language
author: Oleh Kubalskyi
Urgency of the research. In recent years, the issue of science communication has gained global importance, not least due to the belief that science and technology are the foundation of the knowledge economy. Science and technology are an integral part of our culture and greatly influence our daily lives. Scientific knowledge is useful to society, but at the same time dangerous, which in turn gives the public every reason to know about these new achievements. However, regardless of how research is funded, its implications must be communicated to both scientists and the public.
Target setting. The communication of scientists among themselves and with the public has a long history, but in the era of globalization and in the face of social turbulence, it faces new challenges. The famous philosopher J. Habermas believed that scientific discourse is important if it does not contradict moral guidelines, and that technology is as anthropological as possible and should be present in communication. The question is, is scientific communication really based on the norms generally accepted by society, and what features does it acquire in the context of globalization and social turbulence?
Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. The historical and philosophical aspect of the study of scientific communication is represented by the works of J. E. McClellan, H. Dorn, C. S. Wagner. In the theory of communicative action, a great contribution was made by the outstanding J. Habermas, the nature of the mind and its interaction with science was studied by M. Heidegger, O. Neurath. D. Bugros, K. R. Popper, M. Woelfle, P. Olliaro, M. H. Todd and others, theorized the issues of open society and open science.
The research objective. Scientific communication is a problematic phenomenon, in order to solve the essential features of which it is necessary to study the history of scientific communication, the achievements of the theorists of communication processes, the concepts of open science and open society, to explore the conditions of social turbulence and globalization that scientific communication faces.
The statement of basic material. Science in the modern sense as an experimental science was born only in the 16th century. Despite the fact that even in antiquity the process of accumulation and systematization of knowledge acquired a high level of empirical and practical status, it was far from a rational level. The science of antiquity offered solutions to specific problems, while science in its modern sense operates with theorems and axioms. With the development of science, since the 17th century, the practice of scientific communication has been formed in Europe. Scientific communication through correspondence brought together such intellectuals of the New Age as F. Bacon, G. Galileo, I. Newton, R. Descartes and many others. World science works at the global level as a network, the same “invisible college”. Between the “invisible collegium” of the 17th century and its 21st century counterpart there are many common features, they still contributed to the communication of leading intellectuals, they still function spontaneously. The theorist of communicative action J. Habermas said that his original theory should set new meanings for rationality and social architecture related to it. In conditions of social turbulence, there is a growing need for a special kind of heuristic scientist. A scientist guided by a special path of cognition to a deep understanding of the processes. His activity should be based on the already existing experience and be directed to the constructive result of cognition and action. The essence of this view of the process of cognition lies in the dualism of knowledge and understanding, for example, in the dynamic conditions of social turbulence, it is not enough just to look for the right or useful ways to solve the tasks set, it is also necessary to realize, search for meaning.
Conclusions. In the 19-20th centuries science is gradually becoming a real social institution, the number of scientists in the world has grown from several thousand to several million. The globalization of scientific communication is of an economic nature, but this is not an advantage or disadvantage, it is a characteristic of the era. It has a direct impact on the innovative nature of science. In conditions of social turbulence, established images become vague and need to be rethought. This also applies to scientific communication or rather, the communication competencies of a scientist. What was previously considered sufficient for scientific communication, namely professional knowledge and professional skills, in the conditions of social turbulence turns out to be insufficient.
Keywords: scientific communication, social turbulence, globalization, open science
References:
authors: Tetiana Andrushchenko, Bogdan Siuta, Andrii Savchuk, Oleh Kubalskyi
Urgency of the research. In the process of development, the mimetic principle of art began to be conceived in artistic culture in two directions: as an imitation of the forms of reality, and as an explanation and evaluation of phenomena and events of real life. Gradually, the beautiful in art was transformed from expressing the world of eternal ideas through idealized canons of beauty and the creation of symbolic images to the production of realistic images of reality. And from depicting certain characteristic or typical phenomena of social reality to the complete creative arbitrariness of the artist, free of any objective rules or laws, forgetting about the «sense of inner necessity» (V. Kandinskyi), that is, strictly determined by the spiritual as an essential principle of universal existence. It is also necessary to take into account the fact that when defining essential concepts, in one way or another, in addition to the solution of purely instrumental tasks, the main contours of the problem field of the investigated problem are outlined, its connection with other aesthetic problems, other related concepts.
Target setting. Clarifying the philosophical and cultural dimensions of the problem of art activity requires the development of adequate and effective logical and conceptual tools. Without this, it is impossible to penetrate into the essence of the problem, and to analyze the most important trends in its development. The need to deal with the basic concepts that reveal the specifics of art activity is also due to the fact that already in the content of these concepts, the strategy of theoretical search, and directions of movement of scientific thought are outlined.
The research objective. Current problems of understanding the artistic text and its interpretation in other types of art are considered; the procedural movement of the artistic image and the peculiarities of the ontological paradox of art.
The statement of basic materials. The artistic image is a complex multi-layered entity. It begins with the artist’s idea, which acts as a kind of sketch for the future image. Technical skills and mastery, the artist’s spiritual powers are aimed at realising this idea, but sometimes the idea and its realisation in the material are very far away. An artistic image is an image of the being of an artistic work, a way of thinking in art. In the aesthetic sense, the artistic image is an integral organism in which there is nothing accidental. Therefore, the artistic image is neither an object nor a thought, but a process, not completely concrete in its immersion in the sensual element. The specificity of the cognitive side of the artistic image lies in the fact that in the process of its perception there is a direct vision of truth which does not rely on evidence, there is a diffusion of the artistic and real world.
Conclusions. The complex structure of the artistic image cannot be viewed statically; the artistic image is a process. It is a universal category of artistic creation, a means and form of assimilation of life by art.
Key words: artistic image, understanding, ontological paradox of art, precedent text, art-work, interpretation, multiplicity of content, variability, speech genre, musical composition
References:
Vasil Levkulich, Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Philosophy (e-mail:
SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL POLICY IN THE GRIP OF FALSE WORLDVIEW MARKS
Oleh Kubalskyi, PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor (e-mail:
EPISTEMOLOGICAL COMPETENCE AS SCIENCE IMPERATIVE IN THE ERA OF GLOBAL TURBULENCE
Inna Doroshenko, PhD student (e-mail:
OFFICIAL (UKRAINIAN) LANGUAGE AS THE BASIS FOR THE FORMATION OF THE NATIONAL IDENTITY OF UKRAINIANS
Maiia Marienko, PhD in Pedagogy, Senior Researcher (e-mail:
Oksana Markova, PhD in Pedagogy, Senior Lecturer (e-mail:
Oleksandr Konoval, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor (e-mail:
PECULIARITIES OF ORGANIZING INDIVIDUAL WORK WITH STUDENTS USING DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES
Vita Baidyk, PhD in Psychology, Head of Department of Education Managemen (e-mail:
Olha Kliuchka, PhD in Economics, Associate Professor (e-mail:
ANTI-CRISIS MANAGEMENT IN AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION DURING WAR: THE PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT
Svitlana Bilous, PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor (e-mail:
Maria Novosad, PhD in Art History, Associate Professor (e-mail: novosadmg@ ukr.net, ORCID: 0000-0001-9446-0515)
Bohdan Rokhman, PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor (e-mail:
Lilia Borysevych, Honored Worker of Culture, Associate Professor (e-mail:
CHRISTIAN CULTURE IN UKRAINIAN SOCIETY: FUTUROLOGICAL PROSPECTS
Andrii Shevchuk, Senior Lecturer (e-mail:
ТHE PHENOMENON OF LEADERSHIP AS AN INTEGRAL COMPONENT IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RELIGIOUS EDUCATION
Iryna Lazorevych, PhD student (e-mail:
SACREDNESS IN CONTEMPORARY ART: RELIGIOUS INFLUENCES AND FORMS OF INTERPRETATION
author: Iryna Lazorevych
Urgency of the research. Scientists, pastors, and artists are actively looking for a universal language that would describe the interaction between modern art and religion. Modern artists can serve religion with their talent and aesthetic insight, and religious meanings can contribute to the depth of aesthetic interest. At the same time, in Ukrainian religious studies, there is a lack of research on the connection of religion and religiosity with the modern artistic forms. This article is one of the attempts to contribute to filling such a research lacuna.
Target setting. The sacred is concentrated not only in religious dogmas and confessional practices. These can be places, traditions, actions and rituals associated not only with faith, but also with social practices that involve going beyond the everyday. The situation is similar with religious forms expressed in art. While maintaining an orientation towards the sacred, artists often combine the dynamics of the interaction of the finite, earthly, human and eternal and unchanging in its depiction in a different way.
Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. The work of such authors as J. Baas, B. Williamson, B. Dodge, J. Rowley, E. Madden, S. Abramovych, M. Chikarkova, T. Yaroshovets, etc. was involved in the orbit of reasoning.
The research objective. We aim to analyze the evolution of modern art's view of the sacred; to understand its religious premises and forms on the example of the art of Buddhist, Christian and Islamic orbits
The statement of basic material. The article analyzes the worldview and social contexts of a number of significant works of modern art (literature, painting, cinematography, theater art, architecture), which in one form or another cultivate sacred symbolism. The researcher also interprets the forms of cultivation of traditional meanings of world religions (Buddhism, Christianity, Islam) in modern art.
Conclusions. The conducted research testifies to the intensification of the representation of the religious cluster in artistic pursuits. Although very often religious images are used beyond the traditional context, their artistic processing provides our mind and heart with a whole series of worldview “puzzles”, provides food for thought. They have valuable reflective material for understanding the axiosphere and the essence of man in the face of the universe.
Keywords: religion, axiosphere, sacrality, art, Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, modern art.
References: