Select your language
Select your language
Yuliia Nosenko, Mariia Shyshkina
Urgency of the research. Science and education are integral and important resources for the development of information society. In Ukraine, some structural changes are planned, among which are the integration and development of science and education on the principles of transparency and openness. It is necessary to take into account the foreign experience, global tendencies of digital progress, including the context of Open Science technologies development.
Target setting. The development of the Open Science concept was facilitated by some initiatives, projects, events in different countries of the world. To a large extent, the impetus for its development and distribution was provided by technologies, IT services, and systems. The development of digital technologies has become a significant factor in the development of open access practices and Open Science as a whole that needs further research.
Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. The concept of Open Science and open access became the subject of research by foreign experts (S. Albagli, P. Baumgartner, B. Fecher, P. L. Fernandes, S. Hilpert, H. Korsgaard et al.) and Ukrainian (V. Kopanieva, S. Svystunov, O. Chmyr, A. Shevchenko, etc.) researchers. The issues of digital transformations, e-infrastructures and Open Science, using cloud technologies in scientific and educational open environments are studied (V. Bykov, T. Vakaliuk, O. Hlazunova, S. Semerikov, etc.).
The research objective. To analyze, define and characterize the stages of development of cloud-oriented services and systems of Open Science.
The statement of basic materials. The global initiatives for the introduction of open access are analyzed. The main stages of the development of cloud-oriented services and systems of open science are distinguished. The 1st stage (70's - 90s of the XX century) – the first initiatives to ensure the availability of scientific results and cultural achievements started. The 2nd stage (90s of the XX century - 1999) – digital tools became more accessible to education and science, ways of communication were enriched. The 3rd stage (2000 - 2009) – development of network infrastructures, distribution of open-access software were conducted. IVth stage (2009 – till nowadays) – the spread of cloud-oriented services and systems, development of personalized, adaptive, scientific, and educational environments.
Conclusions. Open Science is a new approach to a scientific process, which is based on joint work and knowledge availability. It has been found that the development of technologies moves in the direction of openness, from local networks to open ones, and with each stage of openness, characteristics are amplified. This trend affects the strengthening of openness in various spheres of activity, including scientific and educational one.
Keywords: cloud-oriented services and systems, Open Science, open access, stages of development.
References:
Shishi Xu
Urgency of the research. In recent years, the concept of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which marks the quantitative and qualitative transition of humanity in the era of high technology, has become increasingly used. Educational systems of the world's leading countries are paying increasing attention to scientific education, which should provide training for generations of citizens, acting as a driving force for social and scientific innovation. There is a question of the possibility of science education to serve as a tool for developing civic competencies, which would allow students to be active participants in social architecture in close connection with the ideas of democracy.
Target setting. The issue of conceptualizing the possibilities of science education is a debatable factor in developing civic worldviews and forming active, responsible, active civic positions. Complications of the above search are provided by scientific discussions of representatives of philosophical schools and areas that argue about the need to interpret citizenship in traditional, national coordinates, or global coordinates, appealing to the concept of global citizenship.
Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. The works of S. Babushko and B. Hoskins are devoted to theoretical issues of developing active citizenship through education. The research of R. Leduc, K. Nicoll et al., A. Nosko et al., W. Roth et al. is devoted to global citizenship development through teaching. E. Jenkins, M. Evagrow et al., S. Kolsto, R. Justi directly attempt to substantiate the axiological content of science education in the formation of the values of active citizenship.
The research objective. This study aims to analyze the potential of science education in shaping the value base of active citizenship, taking national and global socio-cultural contexts into account.
The statement of basic material. The study of science allows individuals to penetrate deeper into modern aspects of the interpretation of the scientific picture of the world, including deepening the understanding of contemporary social architecture. The developed scientific picture of the world allows realizing one’s own, at the level of an individual citizen, involvement in solving global problems of modern civilization (climate change, contradictions of intercultural communication, bioethics, genetically modified organisms, etc.), to form an active position on one’s contribution to large social movements to overcome them. Socioscientific issues are a kind of bridge between active citizenship and science education. The desire to find the truth through long (but not consistently successful) scientific experiments, familiarity with the principles of argumentation, critical analysis of alternative theories, etc. indirectly forms in the individual worldviews, where a plurality of thought, evidence, and propensity to critical (objective) analysis of facts, etc. are essential attributes of active citizenship in our time.
Conclusions. We’ve demonstrated a number of methodological complications for the analysis of the studied problem: transit from the national concept of citizenship to global citizenship with corresponding changes in the axiological dimension, revision of science status and communicative paradigm “science - society” and so on. It has been demonstrated that science education can be an effective educational tool for developing the value base of active citizenship through the involvement of pupils (students) in solving socioscientific issues. It was shown that active citizenship through science education is established by forming a value base centered on critical and rational thinking, democracy as a practice of the scientific environment, developed skills of argumentation, ethical and moral reflection on global civilization, etc.
Keywords: active citizenship, science education, axiology, global citizenship, socioscientific issues.
References:
Anatolii Vovk
Urgency of the research. Volodymyr Shinkaruk's legacy is attracting more and more attention of modern Ukrainian philosophers. Today, the philosophy of Shinkaruk and his associates is evaluated in the context of the continuous philosophical tradition of European and domestic thought. In connection with the demythologization of the history and results of the development of the Kyiv philosophical school, the need for a new analysis of V. Shinkaruk’s concepts of the holism of worldview and philosophical thinking is obvious.
Target setting. The emergence of various interpretations of Volodymyr Shinkaruk's philosophy is caused not only by the texts of the classics of modern Ukrainian philosophy and facts from the history of philosophical thought in Ukraine in the second half of the XX century, but also by the struggle of various narratives that already exist or are offered by philosophers. and post-Soviet times. Different interpretations of the history of philosophy in Ukraine in the second half of the XX century lead to the emergence of different views on the prospects for the development of philosophical thought today.
Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. Modernism has been characterized by speculations about the onset of a new historical epoch, which requires holistic thinking for the development of science, culture and so on. Shinkaruk and his associates give numerous arguments why in times of scientific and technological revolution, a holistic philosophical and ideological thinking is needed. Researchers' attention to the heritage of the Kyiv school is focused on these arguments, while the analysis of the content of the concepts of the integrity of the worldview and philosophical thinking remains unnoticed.
The research objective. The method of statistics is the analysis of historical and philosophical analysis of the concept of the integrity of philosophical thought and lightgazing in the theoretical system of Volodymyr Shynkaruk.
The statement of basic materials. Shynkaruk attributes the holistic reflection of reality to the peculiarities of any worldview in general, and philosophical - in particular. And the founder of the Kyiv philosophical school considers the worldview itself to be a reflection not only of the objective world, but also of human activity. Since the latter is material and practical, it is possible to avoid idealistic conclusions in asserting the integrity of the reflection of reality in consciousness.
Conclusions. In the system of V. Shynkaruk, the "light-gazer" is actually attributed to all the main characteristics of philosophical thought in the first classical variety, in the middle - integrity, connection with cultural life and practice. Philosophy, when you understand, like a theory, whose connection with practice is mediation by numerical forms of light-seeing thought. The mustache forms a light-gazer to reflect the creative nature of human svodomostі and є elements of samosvіdomostі. Philosophy, as a theoretical core of the svetoglyad, completes human self-confidence
Keywords: history of philosophy in Ukraine, modern Ukrainian philosophy, philosophy of Volodymyr Shynkaruk, Kyiv anthropological school.
References:
Ivan Kozii
Urgency of the research. In each period of the development of Ukrainian philosophy, you need to be able to find those ideas that can be applied today. After all, both world and Ukrainian philosophers put the others, as well as themselves, the philosophical questions that troubled them and followed them throughout their lives. But even those periods in the Ukrainian philosophy that people do not feel like mentioning for one reason or another should not be forgotten, be studied, and result in appropriate conclusions.
Target setting. Such a period in domestic philosophy is its Soviet era. In the authors’ opinion, it should be studied at least to prevent something similar in the future. It should be analyzed and released to be able to move forward, having chosen such vectors of the development of the Ukrainian society that today will most fully cover the issues and challenges facing Ukraine in the 21st century.
Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. Such scientists as I. Yakhot, T. Zakydalskyi, M. Rozhenko, M. Oleksiuk, I. Bychko, V. Tabachkovskyi, and the others were engaged in the development of the outlined problems.
The research objective. The purpose of this research is to distinguish, formulate and carry out the impartial study of the main vectors of the development of Ukrainian philosophy of the Soviet period of the 20s-30s of the 20th century.
The statement of basic material. Regarding the development of philosophy in Soviet Ukraine in the 1920s and 1930s, special attention should be paid to its basic concepts, namely: dialectical and historical materialism, the relationship of dialectical materialism with natural science, the problems of studying the history of philosophy, both Ukrainian and world. Moreover, it should be borne in mind that world philosophy was presented at a certain angle and with appropriate adjustments because the spokesmen of Marxist philosophy had a clear plan for how to better promote and implant their doctrine.
Conclusions. Thus, it can be concluded that despite all the above, the modern researchers of the history of Ukrainian philosophy can in no way level or deny the existence of the phenomenon of Ukrainian Soviet philosophy. Its basic concepts can be criticized, you can disagree with them, but you cannot dissociate yourself from them.
Keywords: dialectical materialism, Soviet philosophy, Marxism, historiosophy.
References: