From Hippocrates’ ethics to V. R. Potter’s global bioethics: educational aspects

authors: Svitlana Pustovit, Liudmyla Paliei

Urgency of the research. The last century was marked by globalization, the comprehensive integration of various human activity systems, and the formation of unified spaces, including those for information, communication, economics, etc. In response to civilizational challenges, humanity is acquiring the characteristics of a global moral subject. Global bioethics as a system of moral values and principles, a scientific interdisciplinary direction that combines natural and humanitarian sciences and strives to solve the global problems of humanity, is the most important element of a modern doctor’s worldview and, accordingly, an essential component of today’s educational environment. The European transformation vector of the higher education system chosen by Ukraine necessitates the development of new value-based ethical dimensions, worldview-philosophical and epistemological foundations of a modern university, one of which is a bioethical worldview.

Target setting. Global bioethics, as a new interdisciplinary field of study, started to emerge in the 1970s of the 20th century at the nexus of the natural sciences and humanities. Its primary focus is on considering and resolving the complex ethical dilemmas of preserving an individual’s health and well-being as well as the wellbeing of humanity as a whole and the environment, first and foremost under the circumstances of intensive use of biomedical technologies. With the emergence of global challenges posing a threat to human civilization, there has been a need to increase the role of bioethical education and develop global dimensions of medical education. The modern model of bioethics as a scientific direction and academic discipline cannot be limited to purely medical issues and rely solely on the values of autonomy and freedom of choice of medical service consumers without taking into account humanity’s global ethical problems. In the face of global challenges to contemporary civilization, global bioethics has emerged as a new moral discourse that articulates the values of solidarity, justice, vulnerability, and biodiversity protection.

Latest scientific studies and issues analysis. Among the scientists addressing the conceptual foundations of global bioethics are S. V. Pustovit, M. M. Kyseliov, T. V. Hardashuk, T. V. Mishatkina, T. M. Tsyrdia, V. R. Potter, T. Beauchamp and J. Childress, H. Ten Have, M. Gaille-Nikodimov, D. C. Zanella, A. Sganzerla., and L. Pessini. Educational aspects of global bioethics, features off the modern educational environment and its challenges t have been highlighted in the studies of such scholars as V. P. Andrushchenko, A. V. Horpenko, O. P. Kyvliuk, S. V. Pustovit, T. V. Mishatkina, O. Y. Kubar, T. P. Artimonov, N. D. Kovalchuk, L. A. Ovsyankina, N. Ivanenko, and H. ten Have. A number of scientists, including S. Benataar, H. ten Have, B. Gordijn, E. D. Pellegrino & T. K. McElhinney, Dwyer, L. Gruen and W. Ruddick, A. Majumdar, P. Mishra & R. Kaur, А. Morales-González, etc., have devoted their publications to the substantiation of the role of global bioethics as an essential worldview, axiological, and epistemological component of medical education.

The research objective. To explore the educational aspects of global bioethics (from traditional Hippocrates’ ethics to V.R. Potter’s global bioethics) - a scientific direction and academic discipline as a needed ideological, axiological and epistemological basis for the functioning of the contemporary medical education system.

The statement of basic materials. The educational and sociocultural aspects of global bioethics as an ideological and scientific phenomenon have been addressed. A comparative analysis of two models of bioethics, including T. Bochamp and J. Childres’ biomedical ethics and V. R. Potter’s global bioethics, has been carried out from the point of view of the goals and objectives of the contemporary medical education system.

Conclusions. The evolutionary development of medical ethics as an academic discipline and practice, from Hippocrates’ ethics to V.R. Potter’s global bioethics, has been analysed. It has been concluded that the modern model of bioethics cannot be limited to the principles of biomedical ethics, the consideration of purely medical issues, and reliance solely on the values of autonomy and freedom of choice of the individual as a consumer of medical services without taking into account the global bioethical problems of mankind.  Global bioethics, as an ethics of respect for the autonomy, dignity, and life of all living beings, as a scientific interdisciplinary direction that unites the natural and human sciences and strives to solve the global problems of mankind, is becoming an essential element of a modern doctor’s worldview and, accordingly, an essential component of the contemporary educational environment. It has been shown that the development of international academic mobility, the migration of medical professionals, health tourism, the globalization of clinical research and biomedical technologies, and the expansion of the most contentious area of bioethics are all factors contributing to the global dimension of bioethical education.

Key words: bioethics, biomedical ethics, global bioethics, bioethical education.

References:

  1. Andrushchenko, V, Kyvliuk, O & Skubashevska, O 2017, Informatsiinyi vymir suchasnoi osvity (Information dimension of modern education), Kyiv: “MP Lesia”, 596 s.
  2. Artimonova, TP 2021, ‘Fenomen polikulturnosti osvitnoho seredovyshcha v umovakh dystantsiinoho navchannia (The phenomenon of multiculturalism in the educational environment in the conditions of distance learning)’, Osvitnii dyskurs: zbirnyk naukovykh prats, № 30 (1), s. 7-17.
  3. Bielanova, RA 2001, Humanizatsiia ta humanitaryzatsiia osvity v klasychnykh universytetakh (Ukraina-SShA) (Humanization and humanitarianization of education in classical universities (Ukraine-USA)), Kyiv: Tsentr praktychnoi filosofii, 216 s.
  4. Horpenko, AV 2008, ‘Byoetycheskye problemy sovremennoi obrazovatelnoi paradyhmy (Bioethical problems of the modern educational paradigm)’, Nauka y obrazovanye: sovremennye transformatsii. Kyiv: Yzd PARAPAN, 328 s.
  5. Ekolohichne hromadske zdorovia: vid teorii do praktyky (Environmental Public Health: From Theory to Practice) 2002, red. K. Chu, R. Sympson, Kamianets-Podilskyi: Abetka-NOVA, 290 s.
  6. Ivanenko, N 2020, ‘Vyklyky dlia ukrainskoi medychnoi osvity (Challenges for Ukrainian medical education)’, Molodyi vchenyi, № 3 (79).
  7. Kyvliuk, OP, Hubska, HV & Frants, YS 2021, ‘Eklektyzm virtualizatsii osvitnoho seredovyshcha: epravlinskyi kontekst (Eclecticism of the virtualization of the educational environment: the administrative context)’, Osvitnii dyskurs: zbirnyk naukovykh prats, № 38 (11-12), s. 7-16.
  8. Kovalchuk, ND & Ovsiankina, LA 2020, ‘Problema dialohu u konteksti hlobalnykh protsesiv suchasnosti (The problem of dialogue in the context of global processes of modernity)’, Osvitnii dyskurs: zbirnyk naukovykh prats, № 27 (10), s. 7-16.
  9. ‘Prohrama “Osnovy bioetyky ta biobezpeky” dlia vyshchykh medychnykh zakla¬div osvity Ukrainy III-IV rivniv akredytatsii dlia spetsialnostei “Likuvalna sprava” 7.12010001, “Pediatriia” 7.12010002, “Medyko-profilaktychna sprava” 7.12010003 (Fundamentals of bioethics and biosafety" program for higher medical institutions of education of Ukraine III-IV levels of accreditation for the specialties "Treatment" 7.12010001, "Pediatrics" 7.12010002, "Medical and preventive care" 7.12010003)’ 2011, Kyiv, 19 s.
  10. Pustovit, SV 2009, Hlobalnaia bioetika: stanovlenie teorii i praktiki (filosofskii analiz) (Global bioethics: establishment of theory and practice (philosophical analysis)), Kyiv: Arktur-A, 324 s.
  11. Pustovit, SV 2013, ‘Evropeiskaia bioetika: teoriia i praktika (European bioethics: theory and practice)’, Intehratyvna antropolohiia, № 2, s. 9-15.
  12. Sprinchan, S 2010, ‘Socio-politicheskie aspekty vyzhyvannia chelovechestva  v kontekste ekologo- i bioeticheskoi problematiki (Socio-political aspects of human survival in the context of ecological and bioethical issues)’, Ecologicheskaia etika: syla etiki dlia ustoichivogo razvitiia. Monografiia, red. N. Vasilievene, А. Yurchukonite. Vilnus: Izd Universitet Mikolasa Romerisa, s. 264-270. 
  1. Basic documents: forty-ninth edition (including amendments adopted up to 31 May 2019) 2020, Zheneva: World Health Organization, P.1.
  2. Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF 1994, Principles of biomedical ethics, N.-Y., Oxford: Oxford university press, 546 р.
  3. Benatar, S 2018, ‘Global Bioethics and Global Education’, In Henk ten Have (ed.), Global Education in Bioethics, Springer Verlag, pp. 23-36. 
  4. Bhandarkar, S 2020, ‘The Hypocrisy of Hippocrates: Ethics from Medical Oaths’, Yale Global Healthcare Review, November 21.
  5. Chrisafis, A 2013, ‘PIP breast implant victims express fury at “catastrophic” fraud trial’, The Guardian, 17 April.
  6. Claudot, F, Alla, F, Ducrocq, X & Coudane, H 2007, ‘Teaching ethics in Europe’, Journal of Medical Ethics, № 33, pp. 491-495.
  7. Fox, DM 1993, ‘View the Second’, Special supplement. Hastings Center Report. Nov.-Dec. S1–S4.
  8. Jones, FAE, Knights DPH, Sinclair VFE & Baraitser P 2013, ‘Do health partnerships with organizations in lower income countries benefit the UK partner? A review of the literature’, Globalization and Health 9, 38 p.
  9. Have ten, H& Gordijn, B 2013, ‘The diversity of bioethics’, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy.16 (4), pp. 635-637.
  10. Have ten, H 2014, ‘Bioethics Education’, Handbook of Global Bioethics, ed by Have ten, H & Gordijn, B, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, pp. 447-466.
  11. Have ten, H 2013, ‘Bioethics education in a global perspective’, Challenges in Global Bioethics, by H. ten Have.
  12. Gaille-Nikodimov, M 2011, ‘L’idée de “bioéthique globale”: un combat à reprendre? Le travail de la philosophie et l’histoire tronquée de l’éthique médicale’, Cahiers philosophiques, № 2 (125), pp. 131-
  13. Gruen, L & Ruddick, W 2009, ‘Biomedical and Environmental Ethics Alliance: Common Causes and Grounds’, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, № 6(4), pp. 457-466.
  14. Macer, D 1999, ‘University of Tsukuba, Japan Bioethics in and from Asia’, Journal of Medical Ethics, № 25, pp. 293-295.
  15. Majumdar, A, Mishra, P&  Ravinder, K 2021, ‘Social Sciences, Bioethics, and the Question of Population’, Asian Bioethics Review, № 13 (1), pp. 1-5.
  16. Morales-González, Á, Tirado-Lule, JM, González-Cisneros A, López-De-León EO, Sanchez-Morales, A & Manzanilla-Granados, HM 2017, Chapter 5. Bioethics in Education. Reflections on Bioethics, ed. by Morales-González, JA & Aguilar Nájera, ME.
  17. Myser, C 2011, Bioethics around the globe, New York: Oxford University Press.
  18. Pellegrino, ED & McElhinney, TK 1982, Teaching ethics, the humanities, and human values in medical schools: A ten-year overview, Washington, DC: Institute of Human Values in Medicine/Society for Health and Human Values, 20 p.
  19. Potter, VR 1971, Bioethics: bridge to the future, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 120 p.
  20. Potter, VR 1988, Global bioethics. Building on the Leopold Legacy, Michigan: Michigan State University Press, 121
  21. Ratankul, P 1999, ‘Love in Buddhist bioethics’, Eubios J. of Asian International bioethics, № 9, pp. 45-46.
  22. Thornton, T 2006, Judgement and the role of the metaphysics of values in medical ethics. J. of Medical Ethics. 2006. N 32. P. 365-370.
  23. Tsai,-C 1999, ‘Ancient Chinese medical ethics and the four principles of biomedical ethics’, J. Med. Ethics. № 25, pp. 315-336.
  24. Veatch, RM 2000, The basics of bioethics, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 180 p.
  25. Zanella, DC, Sganzerla, A & Pessini, L 2019, ‘Potter’s global bioethics’, Ambiente & Sociedade, Vol 22, pp. 2-8.

 

Communicative practices of the 19th century, or something about their benefits and harms for the post-industrial era

author: Nataliia Radinova

Urgency of the research. In the post-industrial era, referring to the communicative practices of the 19th century, reproduced in the socio-cultural space of the Slobozhanshchyna of that time, is relevant for at least two reasons. Firstly, it provides a broader understanding of the information transmission mechanism at the level of primary communication, its selection, and the generation of secondary meanings, which depends, to a considerable extent, on ethnonational specificity. Secondly, the internal drama of national self-assertion in the Sloboda region contributes to understanding the underlying foundations of contemporary Russian aggression.

Target setting. In modern Ukrainian realities, where the risk of falling into an information trap is too high, it is important to carry out communicative enlightenment. Understanding the past experience of our country plays an important role in this regard.

Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. The study of communicative practices and communicative processes has been reflected in the field of political and sociological research. It is worth noting the works of domestic researchers such as A. Yermolenko, O. Kyvliuk, M. Kultayeva, H. Pochepsov, and L. Sytnichenko.

The research objective. To examine the functional possibilities and human-creative potential of communicative practices of the 19th century, and to identify their heuristic potential for enhancing the effectiveness of communication processes in the post-industrial era.

The statement of basic materials. Communication, encompassing a wide range of social, political, cultural, and educational meanings, acquires special status and significance in the post-industrial society. However, few pay attention to the role played by the phenomenon of “simultaneous non-simultaneity” in the modern world. The communicative practices of the 19th century provide a conceptual key to understanding why Ukraine's integration into the global cultural space as a unique subject encounters difficulties resulting from previous development.

Conclusions. Communicative practices of the 19th century, viewed through the lens of the post-industrial society, reflect the practices of contemporary educational, cultural, political, and social existence, demonstrating communicative or repressive mechanisms of their perception, understanding, and interpretation, depending on ethno-cultural communicative experience.

Keywords :communicative practices, information, communicative experience, freedom, national self-assertion, 19th-century, Slobozhanshchyna, post-industrial, Russian aggression.

References:

  1. Bystrytskyi, Ye, Proleiev, S, Bilyi, O, Loznytsia, S, Zymovets, R & Kobets, R 2018, Natsionalna identychnist i hromadianske suspilstvo (National identity and civil society), vyd. 2-he, dopov., Kyiv: DUKh I LITERA.
  2. Bystrytskyi, Ye, Zymovets, R & Proleiev, S 2020, Komunikatsiia i kultura v hlobalnomu sviti (Communication and culture in a global world), Kyiv: DUKh I LITERA.
  3. Viuller, T 2018, Shcho take chas? (What is time?), per. z norvezkoi, Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr; Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Anetty Antonenko.
  4. Derzhavnyi arkhiv Kharkivskoi oblasti (n.d.), Ekzempliar promov studentiv Kharkivskoho universytetu (A copy of the speeches of Kharkiv University students). F. 3. Op. 35 ed. khr. 93.
  5. Derzhavnyi arkhiv Kharkivskoi oblasti (n.d.), Ekzempliar promov studentiv Kharkivskoho universytetu (A copy of the speeches of Kharkiv University students). F. 3. Op. 39 ed. khr. 99.
  6. Kyvliuk, OP 2011, Informatsiina pedahohika: filosofiia, teoriia, praktyka (Information pedagogy: philosophy, theory, practice). Monohrafiia, Kyiv: UAN VIR.
  7. Kolektyvna pamiat, prymyrennia i mizhnarodni vidnosyny (Collective memory, reconciliation and international relations) 2023, Kolektyvna monohrafiia, nauk. red. Nikolia Maslovski, Anzhei Sheptytskyi; nauk. red. ukr. Vydannia Kyrydon, AM & Troian, SS; per. z polsk. Sahan, VF, Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr,
  8. Pocheptsov, HH 2022, Toksychnyi infoprostir. Yak zberehty yasnist myslennia i svobodu dii (Toxic infospace. How to maintain clarity of thinking and freedom of action), Kharkiv: Vivat.
  9. Radionova, NV 2008, Reprezentatsii filosofii v osvitnomu prostori Slobozhanshchyny u XIX stolitti (Representations of philosophy in the educational space of Slobozhanshchyna in the 19th century), Sumy: VAT “SOD”, vydavnytstvo “Kozatskyi val”.
  10. Kharkivskyi natsionalnyi universytet im. V. N. Karazina za 200 rokiv (Kharkiv National University named after V. N. Karazin for 200 years) 2004, Kharkiv: Folio.
  11. Luhmann, N 1998, Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, Frakfurt.
  12. Treml, AK 2004, Das Alte und das Neue. Erziehung und Bildung in evolutionstheoretischer Sicht

 

Digital rights as an expression of digital human attributes: a socio-philosophical education

authors: Olga Kyvliuk, Valentyna Voronkova, Vìtalina Nikitenko

Urgency of the research is that today a new type of rights is emerging - digital human rights, which are a product of the digital evolution of human rights theories in the Information Technology Age. The digital attributes of human beings highlight that the digital existence of people in society has become an objective fact as there is constant digitalization in the spheres of existence, life, and productive activities.

Target setting. It is important to research the conceptual aspects of digital human rights, acquiring "digital attributes", and forming relatively stable concepts such as: "information person", "smart society", "digital economy", etc. "Digital attributes" of the individual are embedded in all social relations in the digital space, which is the result of the expansion of the individual's social attributes in the digitalization context. The implementation of the Digital Attributes within the existing legal system, its form, and structure will positively contribute to the expansion of digital human rights protection areas in the digital space.

Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. This study substantiates the theoretical and practical aspects of digital human rights, which is an expression of digital attributes. The authors are guided by documents from international organizations exploring the issue of digital human rights, as well as studies: R. Andriukaitene, V. Voronkova, O. Kyvliuk, V. Nikitenko, R. Oleksenko, A. Cherep, O. Cherep and others. We agree that international organizations and governments of developed countries (USA, Japan, UK, China) have done much to protect digital human rights in the Internet era when they were just beginning to emerge.

The research objective. Conceptualizing the theoretical and practical aspects of digital human rights as an expression of digital attributes demonstrates the evolution of the human being from biological to informational and digital. The rise of global digital legislation has empowered individuals with a number of rights related to the protection of personal information/data, expanding and protecting everyone's rights in the digital space.

The statement of basic materials. The article is devoted to the study of conceptual aspects of the evolution from dynamic digitization to digital human attributes; analysis of digital human rights in the "decentralized" Internet environment/Metauniverse; elucidation of the essence and characteristics of digital human rights; formation of the concept of "digital human rights" and identification of its significance for modernity.

Conclusions. The digitalization of human activities and the 'digital attributes' that create a digital society are analyzed. Digital human rights are linked to core security interests and values within the framework of protecting people's rights and freedoms. The establishment of the legal rights of people's digital attributes, the mechanisms for realizing legal protection, and their systematization should contribute to the transformation of legal digital human rights and influence real life by fulfilling the obligations of both the state and each citizen.

Key words: digital rights, digital society, Metauniverse, digital attributes, digital rights defence, digital jurisprudence.

 References:

  1. Afanasieva, LV, Muzia, YeM, Koleva, K & Oleksenko, RI 2017, ‘Mizhkulturnyi dialoh v konteksti yednannia Ukrainy (Intercultural dialogue in the context of the unity of Ukraine)’, Ukrainoznavchyi almanakh, Vyp. 21, s. 15-20.
  2. Voronkova, V, Kyvliuk, O & Andriukaitene, R 2023, ‘Evoliutsiia vid aktyvnoho vidpovidalnoho hromadianstva do tsyfrovoho v konteksti krytychnoho myslennia: dosvid krain YeS (Evolution from active responsible citizenship to digital in the context of critical thinking: the experience of EU countries)’, Humanities studies: Collection of Scientific Papers, ed. V. Voronkova, Zaporizhzhia: Publishinghouse “Helvetica”, № 14 (91), s. 23–34. Dostupno: <http://humstudies.com.ua/article/view/277846/272597>. [23 Berezen 2023].
  3. Voronkova, VH & Kyvliuk, OP 2022, ‘Vidpovidalne tsyfrove hromadianstvo v epokhu tsyfrovykh tekhnolohii (Responsible digital citizenship in the age of digital technologies)’, Modern scientific strategies of development : collective monograph. Compiled by V. Shpak; Chairman of the Editorial Board S. Tabachnikov. Sherman Oaks, California: GS Publishing Services, s. 226-249. Dostupno: <https://www.eo.kiev.ua/resources/arhivMonographs/mono2022_dev_008.pdf>. [23 Berezen 2023].
  4. Voronkova, V, Nikitenko, V & Vasylchuk, G 2022, ‘European paradigm of socially responsible governance as conditions for exiting the COVID-19 pandemic crisis’, Osvitnii dyskurs: zbirnyk naukovykh prats, Kyiv: TOV “Naukovo-informatsiine ahentstvo “Nauka-tekhnolohii-informatsiia”,  № 39 (1-3), s. 26-36. Dostupno: <https://www.journal-discourse.com/uk/arkhiv/2022-rik/vipusk-39-1-3>. [23 Berezen 2023].
  5. Hudmen, M 2019, Zlochyny maibutnoho: use vzaiemopoviazane, usi vrazlyvi i shcho my mozhemo z tsym zrobyty (Crimes of the Future: Everything is Connected, Everyone is Vulnerable and What We Can Do About It), per z anhl. I. Mazarchuk, Ya. Mashyko, Kyiv: Vyd-vo Ranok: Fabula, 592 s.
  6. Hupta, S 2020, Tsyfrova stratehiia (Digital strategy). Posibnyk iz pereosmyslennia biznesu, per. z I. Kovalyshenoi, Kyiv: Vyd-vo KM-BUKS, 320 s.
  7. Diamandis, P & Kotler, S 2021, Maibutnie blyzhche, nizh zdaietsia. Yak tekhnolohii zminiuiut biznes, promyslovist i nashe zhyttia (The future is closer than it seems. How technology is changing business, industry and our lives), per. z anhl. Dmytro Kozhedub, Kyiv: Laboratoriia, 320 s.
  8. Zakon Ukrainy “Pro zakhyst personalnykh danykh” (Law of Ukraine “On Protection of Personal Data”) 2010, Dokument № 2297-VI, Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR), № 34, st. 481. Dostupno: <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2297-17#Text>. [23 Berezen 2023].
  9. Kyvliuk, OP, Voronkova, VH & Nikitenko, VO 2023, ‘Intehratsiia virtualnoi realnosti ta osvity v konteksti kreatyvnosti ta suchasnykh tendentsii tsyfrovoho  rozvytku (Integration of virtual reality and education in the context of creativity and modern trends of digital development)’, Science and society: trends of interaction : collective monograph. Compiled by V. Shpak; Chairman of the Editorial Board S. Tabachnikov. Sherman Oaks, California: GS Publishing Services, s. 47-63. Dostupno: <https://www.eo.kiev.ua/resources/arhivMonographs/mono_2023_13/mono_2023_13.pdf>. [23 Berezen 2023].
  10. Kyvliuk, OP & Voronkova, VH 2022, ‘Filosofska refleksiia informatsiinoi bezpeky u tsyfrovomu seredovyshchi: problemy, ryzyky, pravove zabezpechennia (Philosophical reflection of information security in the digital environment: problems, risks, legal support)’, Innovative resources of modern science: collective monograph. Compiled by V. Shpak; Chairman of the Editorial Board S. Tabachnikov. Sherman Oaks, California: GS Publishing Services, s.160-172. Dostupno: <https://www.eo.kiev.ua/resources/zmist/mono9/Monograph_9-160-172.pdf>. [23 Berezen 2023].
  11. Kyvliuk, OP & Voronkova, VH 2022, ‘Filosofska refleksiia pravovykh zasad zakhystu intelektualnoi vlasnosti (Philosophical reflection of the legal foundations of intellectual property protection)’, Sotsialno-humanitarni vymiry pravovoi derzhavy: materialy Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii, 27 zhovtnia 2022 r., m. Dnipro, Dnipro: Dniprop. derzh. un-t vnutr. sprav, s. 114-120.
  12. Levitin, D 2020, Strukturovane myslennia. Yasnyi rozum v informatsiinomu khaosi (Structured thinking. A clear mind in information chaos), per. z anhl. Roman Shyian, Kyiv: Nash format, 456 s.
  13. Nikitenko, VO, Oleksenko, RI & Kyvliuk, OP 2022, ‘Stanovlennia i rozvytok osvity u didzhytalizovanomu suspilstvi (Formation and development of education in a digitalized society)’, HUMANITIES STUDIES : Collection of Scientific Papers. ed. V. Voronkova, Zaporizhzhia: Publishing house “Helvetica”, № 10 (87), s. 53-63. Dostupno: <http://humstudies.com.ua/article/view/254703>. [23 Berezen 2023].
  14. Nikitenko, V, Metelenko, N, Voronkova, V & Vasylchuk, H 2023, ‘Kontseptsiia transformatsii osvitnoi paradyhmy, oriientovanoi na potreby ta “osvitu vprodovzh vsoho zhyttia” (The concept of transformation of the educational paradigm, focused on needs and “lifelong education”)’, Humanities studies: Collection of Scientific Papers. Ed. V. Voronkova, Zaporizhzhia: Publishinghouse “Helvetica”, № 14 (91), c. 93–101. Dostupno: <http://humstudies.com.ua/article/view/277858/272607>. [23 Berezen 2023].
  15. Nikitenko, VO & Kyvliuk, OP 2022, ‘Cystemne ta data-analitychne myslennia yak stratehichni resursy suchasnykh orhanizatsii (Systemic and data-analytical thinking as strategic resources of modern organizations)’, Systemnyi analiz v upravlinni: mizhhaluzevi doslidzhennia: materialy IV Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii za mizhnarodnoi uchasti, 26-27 travnia 2022 roku, Natsionalnyi pedahohichnyi universytet imeni M. P. Drahomanova, Kyiv: Oreol-Servis, s. 77-80.
  16. Oleksenko, RI 2017, ‘Liudyna v umovakh informatsiinoho suspilstva yak obiekt sotsialno-ekonomichnoi refleksii (A person in the conditions of the information society as an object of socio-economic reflection)’, Stanovlennia i rozvytok informatsiinoho suspilstva yak osnovy zabezpechennia konkurentospromozhnosti Ukrainy u sviti ta staloho rozvytku suspilstva i derzhavy, s. 59-62.
  17. Cherep, AV, Voronkova, VH, Cherep, OH & Nikitenko, VO 2022, ‘Eksponentsiini tekhnolohii yak ekonomichnyi resurs kontseptsii tsyfrovoi ekonomiky (Exponential technologies as an economic resource of the digital economy concept)’, Innovative resources of modern science: collective monograph. Compiled by V. Shpak; Chairman of the Editorial Board S. Tabachnikov, Sherman Oaks, California: GS Publishing Services, c. 48-58. Dostupno: <https://www.eo.kiev.ua/ua/content/148/>. [23 Berezen 2023].
  18. Cherep, A, Voronkova, V & Cherep, O 2022, ‘Tolerance in the discurse practices of european society and business’, Humanities studies: Collection of Scientific Papers, e V.Voronkova, Zaporozhzhia: Publishing house “Helvetica”, № 12 (89), с. 160–173. Available from: <http://humstudies.com.ua/article/view/266508/262522>. [23 March 2023].
  19. Voronkova, V, Kyvliuk, O & Nikitenko, V  2023, ‘The concept of smart education as a factor in enhancing digitalization and intellectualisation’, Prospective directions of scientific and practical activity : collective monograph, Compiled by V. Shpak; Chairman of the Editorial Board S. Tabachnikov. Sherman Oaks, California: GS Publishing Services,  рр. 91-110. Available from: <https://www.eo.kiev.ua/resources/zmist/mono11/mono_2023_11.pdf>. [23 March 2023]. 

 

2023 y.: 44(4-6)

Issue 43(1-3)

Boris Novikov,  Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Philosophy, National Technical University of Ukraine “Kyiv Polytechnic Institute Igor Sikorsky” (E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8850-315X)

 Olha Potishchuk, PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” (E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9767-237X)

 Tetiana Bubon, Lecturer of the Department of Philosophy, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” (E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6427-4180)

HUMAN CREATIVE POTENTIAL AS A DRIVING FORCE OF MODERN SOCIETY

Vitalii Ihnatiev, PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Language and Humanities № 1, Donetsk National Medical University (Е-mail : This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-6580)

HESYCHASTIC TRADITION AS A SOURCE OF UKRAINIAN CORDOCENTRISM

Ihor Kyvliuk, PhD student of the Department of Philosophy, sociology and political science, State University of Trade and Economics (Е-mail : This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1092-9126)

SOCIAL ROLE OF THE UNIVERSITY: ITS RELEVANCE AND MODERN CHALLENGES

Ruslana Atashkadeh, PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor  of the Philosophy of Humanities Department, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Е-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5349-9579)

SPECIFICITY OF INNOVATION IN CONDITIONS OF BRAIN DRAIN

Oleh Vereshchahin, PhD student of the Department of Philosophy, H. S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University (Е-mail : This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2515-7698)

MILITARY STYLE DESIGN AND ITS IMPACT ON HUMAN SELF-REALISATION

Vasyl Lozovytskyi, PhD in Theology, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Holy Scripture and Theology, Volyn Orthodox Theological Academy (VOTA) Orthodox Church of Ukraine (Е-mail : This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5645-4309)

CRITICISM OF SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVISM IN THE POST-METAPHYSICAL THEOLOGY OF COMMUNICATION BY O. FILONENKA

Bohdan Rokhman, PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy, Sociology and Religious Studies, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University (Е-mail : This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6684-4674)

Oleh Savchuk, PhD in Philosophy, Head of the Department of Theology and Social Sciences named after Academician Father Ivan Lutskyi of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, Institution of Higher Education “King Danylo University” (Е-mail : This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5855-1628)

Svitlana Bilous, PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy, Sociology and Religious Studies, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University (E-mail : This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3681-2540)

Maria Novosad, PhD in Art History, Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy, Sociology and Religious Studies, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University (E-mail : novosadmg@ ukr.net, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9446-0515)

THE PHENOMENON OF FREEDOM AS THE FUNDAMENTAL ESSENCE OF THE FORMATION OF SOCIETY

Iryna Lutsenko, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Senior Researcher of the Laboratory of Preschool Education and Upbringing of the Center for Early Child Development and Preschool Education, Institute of Education Problems of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Е-mail : This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8360-9943)

FORMATION OF THE PURPOSE, GOALS, OBJECTIVES OF EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES OF PRESCHOOL EDUCATION INSTITUTION, ASSESSMENT OF THEIR QUALITY: MODIFICATION OF SMART CRITERIA

Oleksandr Halytskyi, PhD in Pedagogy, Senior Lecturer, Department of Computer and Software Engineering, Ukrainian State University named after Mykhailo Drahomanov (E-mail: o.v.galutskyi@u   pu.edu.ua, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7694-3019)

Inna Kucherenko,  PhD in Pedagogy, Аssociate professor, Deputy Head of the Educational and Methodological Department, Bogomolets National Medical University (Е-mail : This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0734-6544)

Pavlo Mykytenko, PhD in Pedagogy, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Medical and Biological Physics and Informatics, Bogomolets National Medical University (Е-mail : This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1188-4334)

THE WEBSITE OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION AND ITS IMPORTANCE IN THE INFORMATION AND EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

Dmytro Verbovetskyi , PhD student, Institute for Digitalization of Education National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine (Е-mail : This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4716-9968)

ANALYSIS OF THE EXPERIENCE OF INTRODUCING GAMIFICATION INTO THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS

 

  1. Analysis of the experience of introducing gamification into the educational process
  2. The website of the higher education institution and its importance in the information and educational environment
  3. Formation of the purpose, goals, objectives of educational activities of preschool education institution, assessment of their quality: modification of SMART criteria
  4. The phenomenon of freedom as the fundamental essence of the formation of society

Page 15 of 52