Select your language

 Anatolii Vovk


Urgency of the research. Volodymyr Shinkaruk's legacy is attracting more and more attention of modern Ukrainian philosophers. Today, the philosophy of Shinkaruk and his associates is evaluated in the context of the continuous philosophical tradition of European and domestic thought. In connection with the demythologization of the history and results of the development of the Kyiv philosophical school, the need for a new analysis of V. Shinkaruk’s concepts of the holism of worldview and philosophical thinking is obvious.

Target setting. The emergence of various interpretations of Volodymyr Shinkaruk's philosophy is caused not only by the texts of the classics of modern Ukrainian philosophy and facts from the history of philosophical thought in Ukraine in the second half of the XX century, but also by the struggle of various narratives that already exist or are offered by philosophers. and post-Soviet times. Different interpretations of the history of philosophy in Ukraine in the second half of the XX century lead to the emergence of different views on the prospects for the development of philosophical thought today.

Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. Modernism has been characterized by speculations about the onset of a new historical epoch, which requires holistic thinking for the development of science, culture and so on. Shinkaruk and his associates give numerous arguments why in times of scientific and technological revolution, a holistic philosophical and ideological thinking is needed. Researchers' attention to the heritage of the Kyiv school is focused on these arguments, while the analysis of the content of the concepts of the integrity of the worldview and philosophical thinking remains unnoticed.

The research objective. The method of statistics is the analysis of historical and philosophical analysis of the concept of the integrity of philosophical thought and lightgazing in the theoretical system of Volodymyr Shynkaruk.

The statement of basic materials. Shynkaruk attributes the holistic reflection of reality to the peculiarities of any worldview in general, and philosophical - in particular. And the founder of the Kyiv philosophical school considers the worldview itself to be a reflection not only of the objective world, but also of human activity. Since the latter is material and practical, it is possible to avoid idealistic conclusions in asserting the integrity of the reflection of reality in consciousness.

Conclusions. In the system of V. Shynkaruk, the "light-gazer" is actually attributed to all the main characteristics of philosophical thought in the first classical variety, in the middle - integrity, connection with cultural life and practice. Philosophy, when you understand, like a theory, whose connection with practice is mediation by numerical forms of light-seeing thought. The mustache forms a light-gazer to reflect the creative nature of human svodomostі and є elements of samosvіdomostі. Philosophy, as a theoretical core of the svetoglyad, completes human self-confidence

Keywords: history of philosophy in Ukraine, modern Ukrainian philosophy, philosophy of Volodymyr Shynkaruk, Kyiv anthropological school.


References:

  1. Yermolenko, A 2010, ‘Iednist znannia u svitli dyskursyvnoi krytyky svitohliadnoho pidkhodu (The unity of knowledge in the light of discursive critique of the worldview approach)’, v: Filosofski dialohy. Filosofsko-antropolohichni chytannia: tvorcha spadshchyna V. I. Shynkaruka ta sohodennia, Ch. 1, Vyp. 4, Kyiv, s. 52–66.
  2. Ivanov, V 1977, Chelovecheskaya deyatelnost. Poznanie. Iskusstvo (Human activity. Cognition. Art), Kiev: Naukova dumka.
  3. Mareev, S & Mareeva E 2013, Problema myishleniya: sozertsatelnyiy i deyatelnostnyiy podhodyi (The problem of thinking: contemplative and activity approaches), Moskva: Akademicheskiy proekt.
  4. Melkov, Yu 2014, Chelovekomernost postneklassicheskoy nauki (Human dimension of post-non-classical science), Kiev: PARAPAN.
  5. Popov, V 2019, Weltanschauung: 12 narysiv z istorii kontseptu “svitohliad” (Weltanschauung: 12 essays on the history of the concept of “worldview”), Vinnytsia: Donetskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Vasylia Stusa.
  6. Hamitov, N 2002, Filosofiya cheloveka: ot metafiziki k metaantropologii (Philosophy of man: from metaphysics to metaanthropology), Kiev: Institut obschegumanitarnyih issledovaniy.
  7. Hamitov, N 2006, Filosofiya: Byitie. Chelovek. Mir (Philosophy: Being. Person. Peace), Kiev: Tsentr uchebnoy literaturyi.
  8. Shinkaruk, V 2005, Vibrani tvori (Selected works), u 3-h tomah, Kiyiv: Ukrayinskij centr duhovnoyi kulturi, 3, Chastina 2.
  9. Shinkaruk, V & Yatsenko, A 1984, Gumanizm dialektiko-materialisticheskogo mirovozzreniya (Humanism of the dialectical-materialistic worldview), Kiev: Politizdat Ukrainyi.