author: Ruslan Filonenko
Relevance of the research. In the current context of rapid innovation development, warfare is increasingly referred to as a “technological war” or a “confrontation of machines”. Against this background, the issue of preserving human values and adhering to ethical standards in a war where decisions about life and death are increasingly made not by people but by algorithms becomes especially relevant. Studying this issue allows for a critical evaluation of the sustainability of human values under the conditions of radical automation and enables the formation of a framework for controlling the use of autonomous combat systems.
Problem statement. The active integration of autonomous combat systems and artificial intelligence into warfare is transforming the very nature of armed conflict. Traditional concepts of morality, dignity, responsibility, and the value of human life are being seriously challenged. Decisions that were previously the exclusive prerogative of human beings are increasingly delegated to technological systems governed by algorithmic logic rather than ethical reasoning.
Analysis of recent research and publications. The problem of preserving human values amidst the rapid deployment of autonomous military technologies has become the subject of thorough research by both domestic and foreign scholars. In particular, the works of K. M. Tkachenko, S. V. Bielai, P. Asaro, I. Marszałek-Kotzur, O. V. Kostenko, and M. Sassòli explore the ethical implications of using autonomous weapon systems and the consequences of delegating decisions related to the use of force to technical algorithms. Meanwhile, the studies of O. P. Kotlyarenko, L. I. Prypolova, M. Curtis, and R. G. Melikov emphasize the legal challenges of employing such systems within the framework of international humanitarian law.
Research task. The main aim of this study is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the ethical and existential challenges to preserving human values in the era of machine warfare. The objectives include: first, to identify the prerequisites for developing a concept of wartime morality; second, to analyze the features of using autonomous systems and machine decision-making in military contexts; third, to define the ethical and existential issues brought by the automation of war; and fourth, to propose strategies for mitigating the ethical and existential threats to human values in machine warfare. Addressing these objectives necessitates an interdisciplinary approach involving philosophy, ethics, law, technology, and security studies.
Main material presentation. In the present era of rapid advancement of autonomous weaponry, artificial intelligence, and unmanned systems, humanity is facing unprecedented moral and philosophical challenges. Armed conflicts are gradually evolving from traditional forms into “machine warfare”, where decisions on the use of force are increasingly made not by humans but by algorithms. This shift in warfare is accompanied by profound changes in the understanding of morality, dignity, and responsibility as key humanistic values. Central to this research is the question of whether it is permissible to delegate life-and-death decisions to technical systems incapable of moral judgment. Also highlighted are issues of emotional detachment, depersonalization of combat, and blurred accountability for acts of violence. These challenges necessitate a philosophical rethinking of the nature of moral choice in the deeply automated context of modern warfare.
Conclusions. The conducted analysis shows that machine warfare presents a fundamentally new challenge not only to military strategy but also to the moral structure of human existence. The loss of control over autonomous algorithms poses risks not only of physical destruction but also of moral degradation, threatening the very foundations of dignity, responsibility, and humanity. Under such conditions, preserving human values requires the re-evaluation and adaptation of ethical principles to new technological realities. Overcoming the ethical and existential challenges related to the development of autonomous combat systems demands the creation of new philosophical approaches that integrate technological efficiency with humanistic values. Therefore, ensuring the preservation of human values in technologically transformed warfare requires an interdisciplinary strategy encompassing philosophical, legal, technical, and humanitarian dimensions.
Keywords: human values, existential challenges, dehumanization, responsibility, machine warfare, ethics of war, autonomous technologies.
References:
- Arendt, H 1999. Stanovyshche lyudyny (The Human Condition), transl. from English by M. Zubrytska, Kyiv : Vydavnytstvo “Lytopys”, 255 s.
- Hobbes, T 2000. Leviiathan abo Sut’, budova i povnovazhennia derzhavy tserkovnoyi ta tsyvil’noyi (Leviathan, or the Matter, Forme, and Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil), transl. from English by R. Dymertse, V. Yermolenko, N. Ivanova, Ye. Miroshnychenko, T. Oliinyk, Kyiv : Dukh i Litera, 606 s.
- Jonas, H 2001. Pryntsyp vidpovidal’nosti: u poshukakh etyky dlia tekhnolohichnoyi tsyvilizatsiyi (The Principle of Responsibility: In Search of Ethics for the Technological Age), transl. from German, Kyiv : Libra, 400 s.
- Melikov, RH 2021, ‘Avtonomni systemy ozbroiennia ta pryntsyp rozriznennia v mizhnarodnomu humanitarnomu pravi (Autonomous Weapon Systems and the Principle of Distinction in International Humanitarian Law)’. Pravo i suspilstvo (Law and Society), no. 6: 315–317.
- Tkachenko, KM & Bielai, SV 2024. Vplyv shtuchnoho intelektu na rozvytok zbroinykh konfliktiv (The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Development of Armed Conflicts) [Electronic resource]. Available from: <https://sts.nangu.edu.ua/article/view/323388/313843>. [14 April 2025].
- Safonik, L 2016. Buttievist’ sensu lyuds’koho zhyttia: monohrafiya (The Beingness of the Meaning of Human Life: Monograph), L’viv : LNU imeni Ivana Franka, 350 s.
- Autonomous Weapon Systems: Implications of Increasing Autonomy in the Critical Functions of Weapons: Expert meeting 2016. International Committee of the Red Cross. Versoix, Switzerland, 15–16 march, 98 p.
- Enemark, C 2021. Ethics of Drone Strikes. Restraining Remote-Control Killing. Edinburg : University Press, 217 p.
- Harari, YN 2018. Homo Deus. A Brief History of Tomorrow. New York: HarperCollins, 464 р.
- Nucci, ЕD & Santoni de Sio, F 2016. Drones and Responsibility: Legal, Philosophical and Sociotechnical Perspectives on Remotely Controlled Weapons. London : Routledge, pp. 1–23.
- Müller, VC 2020. ‘Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics’. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 6. pp. 1–31.
- Singer, РW 2009. Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century. London : Penguin, 499 р.
- Sparrow, R 2007. ‘Killer Robots’. Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol. 24 (1), pp. 62–7
- Walzer, М Just And Unjust Wars. New York : Basic Books, 400 р.
