author: Vasil Levkulich
Urgency of the research. Scientific and educational policy makes a decisive influence on the functioning of science and education as social institutions, as well as on society in general. Therefore the policy has transtemporal relevance. The potential for relevance increases significantly in the modern era of global turbulence and social transformations.
Target setting. The issue is that an adequate response to today's challenges is fundamentally impossible under the conditions of the matrix for stereotypic worldview that was formed during the three previous decades.
Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. In the Western science, F. Coombs, N. Ferguson, K. Lesh, J. Haidt, H. Plaggrose, J. Lindsay, J. Israel, V. Easterly are considered to be the authors of the most thorough works devoted to the issue of worldview orientations of scientific and educational policy. Among domestic researchers, V. Lugovoi, Z. Samchuk, O. Slyusarenko, and Zh. Talanova made the greatest contribution to the development of the mentioned issues.
The research objective. The purpose of the research is a critical analysis of the main shortcomings of modern scientific and educational policy. The tasks are to identify the worldview conditioning of key issues that stand in the way for the effective functioning of the scientific and educational sphere.
The statement of basic material. The main factors of modern scientific and educational policy are analyzed, which are mostly the result of wrong worldview orientations, and therefore require a thorough reflective rethinking.
Conclusions. The main issues and negative trends in the scientific and educational sphere of modern Ukraine are determined by worldview, criterial and axiological vaguenes. First, they need reflexive efforts in the direction of rethinking false stereotypes.
Keywords: policy of Ukraine in the scientific and educational sphere, level of worldview culture, problematic challenges of modernity, scientometric approach, inadequate criteria, conceptualism of quality.
References:
1. Volnievych, B 2020, ‘Naukova krytyka ta kryterii naukovosti’. Filosofiia osvity. Philosophy of Education, per. Oleh Hirnyi, № 26 (1), s. 250–259. Dostupno: <https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2020-26-1-15>. [24 Cherven 2022].
2. Henon, R 2007, Kryzys sovremennoho myra, per. s frants. T. Liubymovoi. Moskva: Alhorytm, 220 s.
3. Kazarynova, DB 2020, ‘Vektory эvoliutsyy polytycheskoi refleksyy y polyteinment’. Sotsyalnye y humanytarnye znanyia, Tom 6, № 2, s. 134–141.
4. Kumbs, FH 1970, Kryzys obrazovanyia v sovremennom myre: Systemnyi analyz. Moskva: Prohress, 261 s.
5. Rezerford, Э 1938, ‘Sovremennaia alkhymyia’. Uspekhy fyzycheskykh nauk, T. 19, № 1, s. 18–48.
6. Samchuk, ZF 2015, ‘Prychynno-naslidkovi zviazky svitohliadnoi zrilosti ta yakisnoi osvity’. Avtonomiia ta vriaduvannia u vyshchii osviti: zbirnyk naukovykh prats, avt. : Bulvinska, OI, Hrytsenko (red.), MV, Riabchenko, VI, Samchuk (red.), ZF & Chervona LM, Kyiv: IVO NAPN Ukrainy, s. 4–123.
7. Samchuk, Z 2020, ‘Tekst polityky na tli tsyvilizatsiinykh kontekstiv i pidtekstiv yak vidsutnii element osvitnoho dyskursu’. Osvitnii dyskurs: zbirnyk naukovykh prats, № 6, s. 7–22.
8. Sliusarenko, O 2022, ‘Koherentnist nauky ta osvity v diapazoni vid instrumentalnoho potentsialu do problemnykh faktoriv funktsionuvannia’. Modern problems in science. Proceedings of the KhIKh International Scientific and Practical Conference, Vancouver, Canada, r. 544–550. Dostupno: <https://isg-konf.com/modern-problems-in-science-two>. [25 Cherven 2022].
9. Fergiuson, N 2020, Hlobalnyi zanepad. Yak pomyraiut instytuty ta ekonomiky. Kyiv: Nash Format, 144 s.
10. Easterly, W 2014, ‘The Tyranny of Experts: Economists, Dictators, and the Forgotten Rights of the Poor’. Basic Books, 416 р.
11. Israel, J 2020, ‘The Enlightenment that Failed: Ideas, Revolution, and Democratic Defeat, 1748-1830’. Oxford University Press, 1088 р.
12. Lasch, C 2018, ‘The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in An Age of Diminishing Expectations’. W. W. Norton & Company; Reissue edition, 368 р.
13. Lukianoff, G & Haidt, J 2019, ‘The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure’. Penguin Books, 352 р.
14. Peirce, CS 1993, ‘Reasoning and the Logic of Things: The Cambridge Conferences Lectures of 1898’. Harvard University Press, 312 р.
15. Pluckrose, H & Lindsay, J 2020, ‘Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything about Race, Gender, and Identity – and Why This Harms Everybody’. Pitchstone Publishing, 352 р.