Select your language

author: Sviatoslav Vaskul


Urgency of the research. Given the multi-confessional situation in the Christian environment, there is a need for a comparative analysis of the theological foundations of the ecumenical concept as a whole, a review of the prerequisites and reasons for the activation of ecumenical trends among Christians, and its functional  aspect of consolidation of efforts.

Target setting. Analytical description of the theological foundations of the formation of the ecumenical paradigm, which were formed by Protestant, Catholic and Orthodox theologians. The positive consequences of the implementation of the ecumenical paradigm in the social sphere, their social significance, as well as their assessment by theologians and researchers are characterized.

Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. The theological intentions and practical initiatives of ecumenism of the Orthodox Church are the focus of Yu. Korniychuk's research attention [17, 18]. R. Protsyuk [19] analyzes the role of the social teaching of Orthodoxy in the formation of civil society in our country. Such domestic researchers as S. Kiyak, P. Yarotskyi, V. Yelenskyi, and O. Kiselyov were engaged in the analysis of the problems of ecumenism as a post-secular paradigm.

The research objective. Given the lack of coverage of the issue of ecumenical efforts as a Christian response to the challenges of modern global society, there is a need for a critical and objective analysis of the ecumenical concept as a whole, as well as in the realm of social practices.

The statement of basic materials. Ecumenism as a phenomenon originates in the Christian environment and its primary goal is to restore unity, first of all, between Christian denominations. An important component of ecumenical activity, which researchers single out, is the social dimension of ecumenism, the consequences of which are much easier to characterize in the social plane. It is worth noting that this dimension is important, given the fact that there are a large number of supporters of the ecumenical movement, who claim that the effectiveness of building ecumenical dialogue and achieving agreement in theological matters is largely determined by social unity, the development of cooperation in a social direction. The transfer of the emphasis of their ecumenical activity by Christian denominations to the sphere of social service, as a result of the confrontation with the difficulties that arose during the theological and dogmatic dialogue, created a favorable environment for the formation of a visible image of Christian unity, which is one of the main elements of the Church's mission in the world. §12 of the “Decree on Ecumenism” states that social cooperation should be aimed at: “proper appreciation of the dignity of the human person, nurturing the good of peace, applying evangelical principles in social life, developing the sciences and arts in the Christian spirit, (...) overcoming such tragedies today, such as hunger and natural disasters, illiteracy and the poor, lack of housing, unfair distribution of material goods.” Such cooperation will also contribute to better interdenominational knowledge of Christians and pave the way towards unity.

Conclusions. Briefly summarizing, we can conclude that the main theological justification of ecumenism lies in the words of Jesus Christ: “That all may be one” (Jn. 17:21), and all other attempts to create a concept to overcome the fragmentation of Christians can only be based on them. Therefore, the consolidation of efforts in the face of various threats makes it easier to establish a dialogue to solve the problem of inter-religious disputes and create favorable conditions for the functioning of a multi-religious society.

Key words: religion, ecumenism, dialogue, inter-Christian (interdenominational) communication, theology, Eucharistic communion, II Vatican Council, social service, social responsibility.


References

  1. Babenko, O 2022, ‘Media ekumenichnoho spriamuvannia v umovakh viiny (na prykladi saitiv “Relihiino-Informatsiina Sluzhba Ukrainy” ta “Dukhovnyi Front Ukrainy”) (Media of an ecumenical orientation in the conditions of war (on the example of the sites "Religious Information Service of Ukraine" and "Spiritual Front of Ukraine"))’, Zhurnalistyka maibutnoho: vyklyky, tendentsii, perspektyvy, s. 110-112.
  2. Butenko, Ya 2014, ‘Vplyv rishen Druhoho Vatykanskoho soboru (1962–1965) na diialnist papy rymskoho Ioanna Pavla II (The influence of the decisions of the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965) on the activities of Pope John Paul II)’, Naukovi zapysky Ternopilskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Volodymyra Hnatiuka. Seriia: Istoriia, № 1 (3), s. 83-87.
  3. Vladychenko, LD 2019, ‘Vseukrainska Rada Tserkov i Relihiinykh Orhanizatsii – ponad dvadtsiat rokiv diialnosti: zdobutky ta perspektyvy (All-Ukrainian Council of Churches and Religious Organizations - more than twenty years of activity: achievements and prospects)’, Sofiia. Humanitarno-relihiieznavchyi visnyk, № 2 (14), s. 5-9.
  4. Hart, D & Khryssavhis, Y 2020, ‘Za zhyttia svitu. Na shliakhu do sotsialnoho etosu Pravoslavnoi Tserkvy (For the life of the world. On the way to the social ethos of the Orthodox Church)’, RISU. Dostupno: <https://risu.ua/za-zhittya-svitu-na-shlyahu-do-socialnogo-etosu-pravoslavnoji-cerkvi_n103522>. [15 Zhovten 2023].
  5. Vseukrainska Rada Tserkov zaklykaie prezydenta Putina zupynyty viinu (The All-Ukrainian Council of Churches calls on President Putin to stop the war) 2022, VRTsiRO. Dostupno: <https://vrciro.org.ua/ua/statements/uccro-calls-on-president-putin-to-stop-the-war>. [10 Veresen 2023].
  6. Hermanova de Dias EV 2017, ‘Kulturolohichni aspekty transtsendentalnoho ekzystentsializmu Karla Ranera (Cultural aspects of Karl Rahner's transcendental existentialism)’, Kharkiv: Kultura Ukrainy. Seriia: Kulturolohiia : zb. nauk. pr., M-vo kultury Ukrainy, Kharkiv. derzh. akad. kultury, Vyp. 55, s. 69–80.
  7. Horokholinska, IV 2019, Demarkatsiia sekuliarnoho / postsekuliarnoho v suchasnii relihiinosti: filosofskyi ta bohoslovskyi dyskurs (Secular / Post-Secular Demarcation in Contemporary Religiosity: Philosophical and Theological Discourse). Dysertatsiia doktora filosofskykh nauk, M-vo osvity i nauky Ukrainy, Nats. Ped. un-tim. M. P. Drahomanova, Kyiv, 510 s.
  8. Hutsaliuk, Yu 2016, ‘Fenomen ekumenizmu ta yoho rol u relihiinomu zhytti (The phenomenon of ecumenism and its role in religious life)’, Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostrozka akademiia”. Seriia “Relihiieznavstvo”, № 1 (13), s. 125-132.
  9. Dokumenty Druhoho Vatykanskoho Soboru (1962–1965): Konstytutsii, dekrety, deklaratsii. Komentari. (Documents of the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965): Constitutions, decrees, declarations. Comments.) 2014, Perekl. z lat., Lviv: Svichado, Ukrainskyi Katolytskyi Universytet, 608 s.
  10. Yehreshii, O 2021, ‘Inkliuziia v Tserkvi: mozhlyvosti, perevahy, vyklyky (Inclusion in the Church: opportunities, advantages, challenges)’, Dobryi Pastyr: naukovyi visnyk Ivano-Frankivskoi akademii Ivana Zolotoustoho. Bohoslovia. Filosofiia. Istoriia, № 16, s. 126-134.
  11. Yeriemieiev, OS 2016, ‘Sviatyi i Velykyi Sobor Pravoslavnoi Tserkvy ta problema stanovlennia Ukrainskoi Pomisnoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvy (The Holy and Great Council of the Orthodox Church and the problem of the formation of the Ukrainian Local Orthodox Church)’, Pravoslavia v Ukraini : mater. VI Mizhnar. nauk. konf. prysviachenoi 1000-littiu dukhovnykh zviazkiv Ukrainy z Afonom (1016–2016) ta 25-littiu Pomisnoho Soboru Ukrainskoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvy (1–3 lystopada 1991 r.), Kyiv, s. 845–853.
  12. Zaiava VRTsiRO ta Upovnovazhenoho VR z prav liudyny (Statement of the VRCiRO and the Human Rights Commissioner of the VR) 2022, VRTsiRO. Dostupno: <https://vrciro.org.ua/ua/statements/statement-of-uccro-and-ombudsman>. [10 Veresen 2023].
  13. Informatsiia pro VRTsiRO (Information about VRCiRO) (n.d.), VRTsiRO. Dostupno: <https://vrciro.org.ua/ua/council/info>. [10 Veresen 2023].
  14. Korniichuk, Yu 2011, Sotsialnyi vymir ekumenichnoi diialnosti Pravoslavnykh tserkov (Social dimension of ecumenical activity of Orthodox churches). Avtoreferat dysertatsii kandydata nauk, Kyiv: NPU im. M.P. Drahomanova, 18 s.
  15. Korniichuk, Yu 2010, ‘Problema pravoslavnoi identychnosti v konteksti rozvytku ekumenichnoho rukhu (The problem of Orthodox identity in the context of the development of the ecumenical movement)’, Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostrozka akademiia”. Ser.: Filosofiia, № 6, s. 187-195.
  16. Komiunike za pidsumkamy vizytu delehatsii VRTsiRO do Vatykanu (Communiqué on the results of the visit of the VRCiRO delegation to the Vatican) 2023, VRTsiRO. Dostupno: <https://vrciro.org.ua/ua/events/uccro-visit-to-holy-see>. [10 Veresen 2023].
  17. Pavlenko, PIu 2005, ‘Utopiia yedynoho khrystyianstva ta konverhentsiini protsesy v nomu (Utopia of a unified Christianity and convergence processes in it)’, Ukrainske Relihiieznavstvo, № 35, s. 139–151.
  18. Pott, T 2009, ‘Sakramentalne rozuminnia Tserkvy: Skhid i Zakhid (Sacramental understanding of the Church: East and West)’, Naukovi zapysky Ukrainskoho katolytskoho universytetu. Seriia: Bohoslovia, № 1, s. 242-250.
  19. Protsiuk, RR 2015, ‘Sotsialna doktryna pravoslavia i stanovlennia hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukraini (The social doctrine of Orthodoxy and the formation of civil society in Ukraine)’, Hrani, № 3, s. 125-130.
  20. U poshukakh yednosti khrystyian (In search of Christian unity) 2008, Kyiv: Dukh i litera, 224 s.
  21. Khaletskyi, O & Holubovska, O 2016, ‘Ekumenizm na stezhkakh teonomnoi sakralizatsii (Ecumenism on the path of theonomic sacralization)’, Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostrozka akademiia”. Seriia “Relihiieznavstvo”, № 1 (13), s. 164-177.
  22. Osnovnye pryntsypy otnoshenyia Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvy k ynoslavyiu (Basic principles of the attitude of the Russian Orthodox Church to heterodoxy) (n.d.), Ofytsyalnyi sait Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvy. Dostupno: <http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/418840.html>. [10 Veresen 2023].