author: Illia Vodovozov
Urgency of the research. In the conditions of modern military challenges, which Ukrainian society has withstood with dignity for a long time, engineering thinking acquires special significance. The intentionality of engineering thinking has a completely different direction in the horizons of peaceful life and in conditions of war. In war options, the technical and creative creativity of engineering thinking is mainly manifested in the development of effective weapons of mass destruction, as well as countermeasures and protection. Accordingly, there is a growing public demand for military engineers and creative workers in the military industry, and especially for a creative engineer who creates vital devices in extreme conditions.
Target setting. High-tech confrontations, security and defense capabilities, the role of engineering in humanitarian missions and rehabilitation, ethical issues of the development of military technologies, the impact of globalization and the role of engineering thinking in post-conflict reconstruction are gaining special importance in modern philosophical discourse. The purpose of the research is to determine the functional potential, social significance and role played by engineering thinking in the creation of state-of-the-art technologies in the conditions of war, as well as to reveal the ambivalence of the impulses of engineering thinking in the options of war and peace.
Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. The works of S. Winchester, E. Meyers, K. Mitch, K. Smythe, A. Ustundag, E. Chevikkan, E. Schatzberg, and others are devoted to the study of the role of technology and engineering in the human life space. Axiological and cultural-anthropological aspects of engineering thinking are considered in the works of Ukrainian researchers. First of all, this is the research of V. Voronkova, I. Goliad, I. Markus, and O. Shulga. Discussions about the responsible use of technology in the context of military operations and the creation and development of more peaceful innovations are of particular importance.
The statement of basic materials. Philosophy of technology is an important area of study because it examines the impact of technology on human existence, society, and the future of humanity. Technologies have a significant impact on human life and international relations, creating new challenges and fundamental questions about the ethics of their use, the responsibility of developers and users, as well as possible consequences for the future world. Issues related to establishing a balance between technological capabilities and general values of society require special attention. The question of the genesis of the definition of engineering success requires special attention, which can conditionally occur depending on the context where the project is carried out. In peacetime, the success of this project is evaluated according to the criteria of efficiency, economy and innovation, since the task is to improve technologies, optimize processes and ensure sustainable development. Engineering thinking in the conditions of a globalized world and longterm geopolitical claims must be ready for such challenges. First of all, it is about responsibility in ensuring the ethical and safe use of their developments. It is about supporting international efforts to control and regulate the export of military equipment, developing principles and standards for the ethical development and use of technologies for military purposes. In addition, engineers can play an active role in the development of technologies aimed at peaceful purposes and limiting the possibility of using technology in military conflicts. The functional potential of engineering thinking in the creation of state-of-the-art technologies in the conditions of war is specified through the ability to develop, implement and adapt technical solutions capable of responding to complex military challenges. This covers the following aspects: innovativeness, adaptability, cooperation.
Conclusions. The prospects for the development of engineering thinking in the context of war depend on many factors, which include scientific and technological progress, the political situation, economic opportunities, social requirements, ethical values, and environmental constraints. Scientific discoveries and technological progress open up new opportunities for the application of engineering thinking in the context of war, in particular through the development of new materials, communi-cation systems, weapons and control technologies. Applying engineering thinking as a problem-solving tool allows you to create a positive impact on society while minimizing negative consequences. In addition, engineers can contribute to the development of technologies for intercultural communication, the promotion of dia-logue and understanding between diverse groups, and the development of techno-logies to provide access to education and information that can help reduce tension and conflict. Therefore, through their technological achievements and engineering thinking, creative engineers can actively contribute to the development of the philosophy of peace and contribute to ensuring stability and harmony in the world.
Keywords: engineering thinking, intentionality, military challenges, ethics in the development of military technologies, globalization and impact on society, innovations in the military sphere, post-conflict recovery, social and environmental responsibility, technological progress and peaceful use, ethical aspects of military technologies
References:
- Vinchester, S 2019, Perfektsionisty. Yak inzhenery stvoryty suchasnyy svit (Perfectionists. How engineers create a modern world), per. z anhl. YE. Daskal. Kharkiv: Vivat, 448 s.
- Horkhaymer, M 2006, Krytyka instrumental’noho rozumu (The сritique of instrumental reason). Kyiv: PPS-2002, 282 s.
- Ketlin, RS 2021, Tsilisne zhyttya planety: vozz’’yednannya zemli, istoriyi, tila ta rozumu (Whole planet life: reuniting earth, history, body, and mind). Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr, 208 s.
- Kozhem`yakina, OM 2019, Dovira yak tsinnisna osnova sotsial’noyi vzayemodiyi (Trust as a valuable basis of social interaction), Cherkasy: FOP Hordiyenko YE. L., 424 s.
- Oltreyd, D 2021, Nove myslennya. Vid aynshtaynu do shtuchnoho intelektu. Nauka i tekhnolohiyi, shcho zminyly svit (New thinking. From еinstein to artificial intelligence. Science and technology that changed the world), per z anhl. I. Voznyaka, Kharkiv: Vivat, 368 s.
- Radionova, NV 2023, ‘Komunikatyvni praktyky XIX stolittya, abo deshcho pro yikhnyu koryst’ i shkidlyvist’ dlya postindustrial’noyi doby (Communicative practices of the 19th century, or something about their benefits and harms for the post-industrial age)’, Osvitniy dyskurs: zbirnyk naukovykh prats’, Vypusk 44 (4–6), s. 22–29.
- Pylypenko, SH 2020, ‘Lyudyna v epokhu tekhnolohichnykh zsuviv: u poshukakh opertya (Man in the era of technological shifts: in search of support)’, Visnyk Kharkivs’koho natsional’noho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina, Seriya “Teoriya kul’tury i filosofiya nauky”, № 61, s. 81–89.
- Shul’ha, O 2021, Nashi. Inzhenerna istoriya Ukrayiny (Nashi. Engineering history of Ukraine), Kyiv: Moya knyzhkova polytsya, 152 s.
- Palmer, H 2007, ‘Catalyzing Systemic Change Towards’, Multidisciplinary, Product Innovation Focus Paper, Conference: June 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. Available from: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345928381_Catalyzing_Systemic_Change_Towards_A_Multidisciplinary_Product_Innovation_Focus>. [1 December 2023].
- Reinhard, K 1994, Ästhetische Korrespondenzen. Denken im technischen Raum, Stuttgart: Reclam, 166 s.
- Salkin, C, Oner, M, Ustundag, A & Cevikcan, E 2018, ‘A Conceptual Framework for Industry 4.0’, Industry 4.0: Managing the Digital Transformation, p. 3–23. Available from: <https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-57870-5_8>. [1 December 2023].
- Sarvari, AP, Ustundag, A, Cevikcan, E, Kaya, I & Cebi, S 2018, ‘Technology Roadmap for Industry 4.0’, Industry 4.0: Managing the Digital Transformation, p. 95–103. Available from: <https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-57870-5_8>. [1 December 2023].
- Waks, S, Trotskovsky, E, Sabag, N & Hazzam, O 2011, ‘Engineering Thinking: The Expert’s Perspective’, International Journal of Engineering Education, 27. 838–851.
- Yasmin, I 2023, Digital Racial: Algorithmic Violence and Digital Platforms, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 208 р.