Select your language

author: Olga Podoliakina


Urgency of the research. Modern society is becoming increasingly dependent on the media. If the processes of social modernization at one time were due to the influence of education, which became widespread in the Enlightenment, the social postmodernization, which has been intensive in recent decades, is due to the spread of mass media. But while education did not experience intense media pressure during the days of television, as its impact was more on adults and its impact on children was fairly easy to control, the Internet era erased virtually all boundaries and prohibitions, and children from an early age were dominated by Internet content, and not educational programs of preschool and school.

Target setting. To determine the relationship of education to the media space, it is necessary to find out to what extent the media in general change the social reality, to what extent this reality is constructed, and only then to decide how education interacts with the media reality.

Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. The issue of media is widely represented in the world and domestic literature, but the connection between the media and education is not fully covered. To identify this connection, it is important to refer to the works of phenomenological sociology A. Schutz, P. Berger and T. Luckmann, media researcher Canadian philosopher M. McLuhan, American public opinion researcher W. Lippman, French philosopher-postmodernist J. Baudrillard, German theorist, author of the theory of social systems N. Luhmann, creator of metaphorology H. Blumenberg, authors of the concept of establishing the agenda M. McCombs and D. Shaw. Also of interest are modern studies by E. Dyakova and A. Trachtenberg, T. Krasikova, I. Lysak, V. Mansurova, and A. Ulanovsky.

The research objective is to identify the main effects of modern media on education and the possible effects of modern education on the media.

The statement of basic materials. The article analyzes the extent to which social reality can be considered as constructed. The main causes and consequences of the media's influence on the construction of social reality are analyzed. The main risks and benefits of the influence of the media on education are identified and the main directions of constructive interaction between the media and education are indicated.

Conclusions. The mutual penetration of education and the media opens up greater opportunities for the reverse impact of education with its potential for critical thinking in the media – but to gain such a tangible impact and effect, this impact must first acquire a media-acceptable format – the system can only be changed from within.

Key words: education, media, media space, social construction, agenda, information, knowledge.

 

References:

  1. Berger, P & Lukman, T 1995. Socialnoe konstruirovanie realnosti. Traktat po sociologii znaniya (Social construction of reality. Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge), per. s angl. Moskva: Medium, 323 s.
  2. Blyumenberg, G 2005. Svit yak kniga (The Legibility of the World), per. z nim., peredmova, komentari Volodimira Yermolenka, Kiyiv: Libra, 544 s.
  3. Bodriyar, Zh 2010. Fatalni strategiyi (Fatal strategies), per. z franc. L. Kononovicha, Lviv: Kalvariya, 192 s.
  4. Gegel, GV F 2004. Fenomenologiya duhu (Phenomenology of the spirit), per. z nim. P. Tarashuk; nauk red. per. Yu. Kushakov, Kiyiv: Vid-vo Solomiyi Pavlichko “Osnovi”, 548 s.
  5. Dyakova, EG & Trahtenberg, AD 1999. Massovaya kommunikaciya i problema konstruirovaniya realnosti: analiz osnovnyh teoreticheskih podhodov (Mass communication and the problem of constructing reality: analysis of the main theoretical approaches), Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN, 130 s.
  6. Kant, I 2000. Kritika chistogo rozumu (Critique of pure reason), per. z nim. ta primit. I. Burkovskogo, Kiyiv: Yunivers, 504 s.
  7. Krasikova, T 2013. ‘Problema konstruirovaniya socialnoj realnosti v teorii massovoj kommunikacii (The problem of constructing social reality in the theory of mass communication)’, Elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal “Sovremennyj diskurs-analiz”, Vyp. 8. Dostupno: <http://discourseanalysis.org/ada8/st58.shtml>. [19 Grudnya 2020].
  8. Lippman, U 2004. Obshestvennoe mnenie (Public opinion), Moskva: Institut Fonda “Obshestvennoe mnenie”, 384 s.
  9. Luman, N 2010. Realnist masmedia (The reality of mass media), per. V. Klimchenko; za red. V. Ivanova, M. Minakova, Kiyiv: CVP, 157 s.
  10. Lysak, IV 2009. ‘SMI kak sredstvo konstruirovaniya socialnoj realnosti v sovremennom mire (Mass media as a means of constructing social reality in the modern world)’, Almanah sovremennoj nauki i obrazovaniya, № 7 (26), ch. 1, s. 92-93.
  11. Maklyuen, M 2008. Galaktika Gutenberga: stanovlennya lyudini drukovanoyi knigi (Gutenberg's Galaxy: the formation of the man of the printed book), vid. 2-ge, pererob., Kiyiv: Nika-Centr, 389 s.
  12. Mansurova, VD 2002. Zhurnalistskaya kartina mira kak faktor socialnoj determinacii (Journalistic picture of the world as a factor of social determination). Monografiya, Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta, 237 s.
  13. Ulanovskij, AM 2009. ‘Konstruktivizm, radikalnyj konstruktivizm, socialnyj konstrukcionizm: mir kak interpretaciya (Constructivism, radical constructivism, social constructionism: the world as an interpretation)’, Voprosy psihologii, № 2, s. 35-45.
  14. McCombs, ME & Shaw, DL 1972. ‘The agenda-setting function of mass media ’, Public Opinion Quarterly. 36, p. 176–187.
  15. McLuhan, M 1967. Understanding Media: the Extensions of Man, London, New York: Sphere Books, 382 p.