European paradigm of socially responsible governance as conditions for exiting the COVID-19 pandemic crisis

 Valentyna Voronkova, Vitalina Nikitenko, Gennadiy Vasyl’chuk

Urgency of the research is that today in the post-pandemic COVID-19 should be formed socially responsible management as a factor in overcoming crisis effectiveness of the post-pandemic COVID-19, in which its paradigm would permeate all institutions and other social systems.

Target setting. It is important to study the conceptual aspects of socially responsible management as a complex adaptive system that contributes to the successful adaptation of management and man to systemic change, overcoming stochasticity, the emergence and maintenance of stability at all levels of society. Socially responsible governance is the result of understanding the depth of human existence and potential, meeting the needs of security, based on ensuring a degree of internal order that helps to overcome disorganization, disorder and uncertainty in both social and individual life.

Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. In the presented research on the conceptualization of socially responsible management, we focus on our own developments: R. Andryukaitene, V. Voronkova, О. Kyvliuk, V. Nikitenko, R. Oleksenko, A. Cherep, O. Cherep and other scientists.

The research objective. Conceptualize new formation and development aspects of socially responsible management, through which society must emerge from the crisis and move to a stability level.

The statement of basic material. The article is devoted to the study conceptual aspects of socially responsible management as a factor overcoming the crisis effectiveness of the COVID-19 pandemic. Socially responsible manage-ment permeates all social spheres: communication, behaviour, subordination of managers with subordinates, commu-nication, information and communication process, information production, health care, human existence of an individual.

Conclusions. Socially responsible management is analyzed, which is firmly integrated into a complex set of economic, financial, social, cultural, information relations and creates a number of problems that require their solution in order to form a sustainable social development; models of social protection and institutional support of socially responsible governments in the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic are investigated; digital technological manage-ment models in European Union countries as a factor in overcoming the crisis in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic are revealed.

Keywords: socially responsible management, pandemic COVID-19, sustainable development of society, social protection model, digitalization.

References

  1. Voronkova, VH 2014, ‘Obshchestvo ryska kak sledstvye kryzysa sovremennoi tsyvylyzatsyy v hlobalnom yzmerenyy (Risk society as a consequence of the crisis of modern civilization in the global dimension)’. Humanitarnyi visnyk Zaporizkoi derzhavnoi inzhenernoi akademii, Vypusk 58, c. 13-24.
  2. Voronkova, V, Andriukaitene, P, Kyvliuk, O, Romanenko, T & Ryzhova, Y 2017, ‘Kontseptualyzatsyia smart-obshchestva y smart-tekhnolohyi v kontekste razvytyia sovremennoi tsyvylyzatsyy (Conceptualization of smart society and smart technologies in the context of the development of modern civilization)’. Mokslas ir praktika: aktualijos ir perspektyvos Taptautinė mokslinė-praktinė konferencija, c. 11-12.
  3. ‘Dosvid perezhyvannia pandemii COVID-19: dystantsiini psykholohichni doslidzhennia, dystantsiina psykholohichna pidtrymka (Experience of experiencing the COVID-19 pandemic: remote psychological research, remote psychological support)’ 2020, Materialy onlain-seminariv 23 kvitnia 2020 roku “Dosvid karantynu: dystantsiina psykholohichna dopomoha i pidtrymka” ta 15 travnia 2020 roku “Dystantsiini psykholohichni doslidzhennia v umovakh pandemii COVID-19 i karantynu”, nauk. redaktory:. Sliusarevskyi, MM, Naidonova, LA & Voznesenska OL, Kyiv : ISPP NAPN Ukrainy, 121 s. Dostupno: <http://ispp.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/Static/dosvid_onl-sem_23-04-20_and_15-05-20_ncov19.pdf>. [12 Berezen 2022].
  4. Oleksenko, R 2017, ‘Liudyna v umovakh informatsiinoho suspilstva yak obiekt sotsialno-ekonomichnoi refleksii (Man in the information society as an object of socio-economic reflection)’. Stanovlennia i rozvytok informatsiinoho suspilstva yak osnovy zabezpechennia konkurentospromozhnosti Ukrainy u sviti ta staloho rozvytku suspilstva i derzhavy, s. 59-62.
  5. Oleksenko, RI 2013, ‘Hlobalni problemy filosofii vid Antychnosti do sohodennia v dyskursi rynkovykh transformatsii (Global problems of philosophy from antiquity to the present in the discourse of market transformations)’. Prydniprovski sotsialno-humanitarni chytannia: u 6-ty chastynakh. Ch. 2: materialy Dnipropetrovskoi sesii II Vseukr. nauk.- prakt. konf. z mizhnarodnoiu uchastiu, s. 148-151.
  6. Oleksenko, RI & Voronkova, VH 2020, ‘Instytutsionalne zabezpechennia systemy publichnoi vlady v istorychnomu i systemnomu konteksti rozvytku publichnoho upravlinnia ta administruvannia (Institutional support of the public authority system in the historical and systemic context of the development of public administration and administration)’. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu tsyvilnoho zakhystu Ukrainy : zb. nauk. pr. Kyiv, № 2 (13), s. 89-104.
  7. Oleksenko, RI & Voronkova, VH 2020, ‘Formuvannia modeli klasyfikatsii sotsialnykh protsesiv u publichnomu upravlinni ta administruvanni: poniatiino-katehoriinyi aparat (Formation of a model for the classification of social processes in public administration and administration: conceptual and categorical apparatus)’. Teoriia ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia : zb. nauk. pr. Kharkiv: Vyd-vo KharRI NADU “Mahistr”, Vyp. 3 (70), c. 82-90.
  8. Oleksenko, R, Voronkova, V & Nykytenko, V 2019, ‘Ekspertyza tsyfrovoi realnosty kak faktor dostyzhenyia ustoichyvosty obshchestva v uslovyiakh stokhastychnosty (neopredelennosty, nestabylnosty, byfurkatsyonnosty) (Expertise of digital reality as a factor in achieving the sustainability of society in conditions of stochasticity (uncertainty, instability, bifurcation))’. Ezhekvartalnyi nemetskyi nauchnyi / nauchno-populiarnyi vestnyk rezultaty raboty uchenykh: sotsyolohyia, krymynolohyia, fylosofyia y politolohiia, Tom.1, № 4, c. 1-10.
  9. Cherep, AV, Voronkova, VH, Cherep, OH, Venherska, NS & Bezkorovaina, LV 2021, ‘Vplyv kreatyvnykh innovatsiinykh tekhnolohii na stalyi rozvytok turystychnoi haluzi v Yevropi pislia pandemii COVID-19 (The impact of creative innovative technologies on the sustainable development of the tourism industry in Europe after the COVID-19 pandemic)’. Humanities studies: Collection of Scientific Papers, Zaporizhzhia: Zaporozhye National University, 8 (85), s. 134-146.
  10. Cherep, A, Voronkova, V & Nykytenko, V 2020, ‘Obratnaia storona tekhnolohycheskykh ynnovatsyi y ykh posledstvyia v uslovyiakh ynnovatsyonno-ynformatsyonnoho obshchestva (The Other Side of Technological Innovation and Its Consequences in the Innovative Information Society)’. Theory and Practice: Problems and Prospects Scientific articles. Kaunas, s. 462-470.
  11. Cherep, V, Voronkova, R, Andriukaitiene, V & Nikitenko V 2020, ‘The concept of creative digital technologies in the tourism business in the conditions of digitalization’. Humanities Studies, 5 (82), pp. 196-209.
  12. Gao, Y 2011, ‘Philanthropic disaster relief giving as a response to institutional pressure: Evidence from China’. Journal of Business Research, 64 (12), pp. 1377–1382. Aviable from: <https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.12.003>. [12 March 2022]..
  13. Isabel, O, Chowdhury, A, Valverde, FD, Muzaffar, T & Urban, S 2019, Fiscal Space for Social Protection: A Handbook for Assessing Financing Options. ILO and UN Women. Aviable from: <https://www.social-protection.org/gimi/RessourcePDF.action?id=55694>. [12 March 2022].
  14. Mahmud, A, Ding, D & Hasan, M 2021, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic’. SAGE Open, January-March 2021: pp. 1–17. Aviable from: <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244020988710>. [12 March 2022].
  15. McLennan, S & Banks, G 2019, ‘Reversing the lens: Why corporate social responsibility is not community development’. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26 (1), 117–126. Aviable from: <https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1664>. [12 March 2022].
  16. Nesterenko, O & Oleksenko, R 2020, ‘Social philosophical reflection of the individual legal education philosophy as the basis for the democratic society functioning’. Humanities Studies, Випуск 4(81), c. 165-181.
  17. Nikitenko, V 2020, ‘Evolution and further development of the real world in the conditions of technological changes in the context of socio-philosophical discourse’. Humanities Studies, 4 (81), pp. 60-73.
  18. Nikitenko, V, Andriukaitiene, R & Punchenko, O 2020, ‘Formation ofsustainable digital economical concept: challenges, threats, priorities’. Humanities Studies, 1 (78), pp. 140-153.
  19. Tovarnichenko, V 2019, ‘Pseudoscience and information security in smart-society’. Humanities Studies, 1 (78), pp. 15-26.
  20. Voronkova, V & Kyvliuk, O 2017, ‘Philosophical reflection smart-society as a new model of the information society and its impact on the education of the 21st century’. Future human image, pp. 154-162.
  21. Voronkova, V, Punchenko, O & Azhazha, M 2020, ‘Globalization and global governance in the fourth industrial revolution (industry 4.0)’. Humanities Studies, 4 (81), pp. 182-200.
  22. World Social Protection Report 2020–22: Social protection at the crossroads ‒ in pursuit of a better future International Labour Office 2021, Geneva: ILO. Aviable from: <https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@dcomm/@publ/documents/publication/wcms_817572.pdf>. [12 March 2022].