The importance of language education in the strategy of training pedagogical personnel

author: Chzhao Han

Urgency of the research. Language training is one of the strategic areas of the formation of pedagogical personnel. The first and the main agent of language strategies in the system of teaching and education of pupils and students is the teacher, the educator. Teachers' mastering of language strategies in the process of teaching at a pedagogical university is seen as a special task of the state's language policy.

Target setting. Language education is a strategically important component in the training of future teachers because it is the qualitative mastery of language tools and techniques that allows the teacher to convey the necessary knowledge to students. The ability to creatively and diversely apply language in pedagogical activity contributes to the maximum disclosure of the teacher's intellectual potential and contributes to a better learning of educational material by students.

Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. In the process of studying the problems of language education in the pedagogical process, the scientific, pedagogical, and philosophical-educational developments of such researchers as A. Asanova, O. Bezkorovaina, M. Kazakova, V. Koval, O. Kucheruk, O. Palekha, N. PodolianskaKalko, S. Roman, T. Severina, N. Sura, N. Siaska and many others.

The research objective of the article is a systematic understanding of language education in the strategy of training a future teacher.

The statement of basic materials. The place and role of language education in the pedagogical educational space are considered, modern standards of foreign language training of future teachers are analyzed. It is emphasized that language education in pedagogical educational institutions should not only form the appropriate level of knowledge and competences, but also provide the studentteacher with a methodological and methodical arsenal for further work. The importance and priority of language education at the state level is emphasized. The role of foreign language training of future teachers in connection with the European integration plans of Ukraine, global processes of internationalization of the educational space is noted. Modern standards of foreign language training of future teachers are considered, determined by European practice in this area and existing domestic legislative acts. They are aimed at establishing qualitative changes in the foreign language training of teachers, an important component of which is the acquisition of stable conversational skills.

Conclusions. Language education is the core of the humanistically oriented system of training future teachers. It is the foundation of valuable and intellectual communication in the educational process. The ability to use language creatively and in a variety of ways in pedagogical activities contributes to the maximum disclosure by the teacher of his spiritual potential, contributes to better assimilation of educational material by students.

Keywords: language education, teacher, language culture, foreign language training, professional competence, language strategies, language policy.

References:

  1. Asanova, AE 2015, ‘Linhvodydaktychna kompetentnist yak kintsevyi osvitnii rezultat realizatsii modeli profesiinoi pidhotovky maibutnikh uchyteliv pochatkovoi shkoly (Linguo-didactic competence as the final educational result of the implementation of the model of professional training of future primary school teachers)’, Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy, Vyp. 3. Dostupno: <http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vnadps_2015_3_3>. [20 Veresen 2023].
  2. Bezkorovaina, OV & Moroz, LV 2012, ‘Aktualni aspekty komunikatyvnoi kompetentsii studentiv VNZ (Actual aspects of the communicative competence of university students)’, Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostrozka akademiia”. Ser.: Filolohichna, Vyp. 25, c. 142–145.
  3. Zhyliaieva, Yu 2011, ‘Osoblyvosti zastosuvannia metodu proektiv u profesiino-pedahohichnii pidhotovtsi vchyteliv inozemnykh mov (Peculiarities of using the project method in the professional and pedagogical training of foreign language teachers)’, Problemy pidhotovky suchasnoho vchytelia, № 3, c. 35–42.
  4. Zahalnoievropeiski Rekomendatsii z movnoi osvity: vyvchennia, vykladannia, otsiniuvannia (Pan-European Recommendations on language education: study, teaching, evaluation) 2003, Nauk. red. ukr. vyd-nia S. Yu. Nikolaieva, Lenvit, Kyiv, 273 s.
  5. Kazakova, MM 2009, ‘Zaprovadzhennia yevropeiskykh osvitnikh standartiv u navchannia anhliiskoi movy studentiv-filolohiv (Implementation of European educational standards in teaching English to philology students)’, Naukovi pratsi Chornomorskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Petra Mohyly. Ser.: Pedahohika, T. 108, Vyp. 95, c. 146–149.
  6. Koval, V 2012, ‘Linhvodydaktychne bachennia yak vazhlyva pedahohichna umova formuvannia linhvodydaktychnoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh uchyteliv-filolohiv (Linguodidactic vision as an important pedagogical condition for the formation of linguodidactic competence of future philology teachers)’, Literaturoznavstvo. Folklorystyka. Kulturolohiia, Vyp. 11–12, c. 223–231.
  7. Kucheruk, OA & Hryban, HV 2008, ‘Rozvytok kreatyvnosti u strukturi metodychnoi kompetentnosti maibutnoho vchytelia ukrainskoi movy (Development of creativity in the structure of methodological competence of the future teacher of the Ukrainian language)’, Pedahohichnyi dyskurs, Vyp. 3, c. 112–116.
  8. Palekha, O 2012, ‘Derzhavna polityka rehuliuvannia pidhotovky maibutnikh uchyteliv inozemnoi movy u Velykii Brytanii (State policy of regulation of training of future foreign language teachers in Great Britain)’, Pedahohichni nauky, Vyp. 3, c. 74–79.
  9. Podolianska-Kalko, N 2013, ‘Movna osvita yak pedahohichna problema. Do pytannia definitsii movnoi osvity ta linhvistyky (Language education as a pedagogical problem. On the issue of definitions of language education and linguistics)’, Naukovi zapysky Kirovohradskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Volodymyra Vynnychenka, Ser.: Pedahohichni nauky, Vyp. 122, c. 274–280.
  10. Roman, S 2012, ‘Profesiino oriientovana inshomovna komunikatyvna kompetentnist maibutnikh uchyteliv inozemnoi movy yak predmet formuvannia v kursi praktyky usnoho ta pysemnoho movlennia (Professionally oriented foreign language communicative competence of future foreign language teachers as a subject of formation in the course of oral and written communication practice)’, Inozemni movy, № 2, c. 39–45.
  11. Severina, T 2014, ‘Inshomovna profesiina pidhotovka maibutnikh pedahohiv v umovakh zaprovadzhennia novoho Derzhavnoho standartu (Professional training of future teachers in foreign languages under the conditions of the introduction of the new State standard)’, Problemy pidhotovky suchasnoho vchytelia, № 9 (1), c. 274-280.
  12. Sura, NA 2003, ‘Metodychne zabezpechennia ta orhanizatsiia navchannia kursu profesiino oriientovanoho spilkuvannia inozemnoiu (anhliiskoiu) movoiu u VNZ (Methodical support and organization of teaching a course of professionally oriented communication in a foreign (English) language at a university)’, Visnyk LDPU im. T.H. Shevchenka, № 7 (63), c. 205–207.
  13. Siaska, NV 2015, ‘Navchannia inozemnoi movy maibutnikh uchyteliv u konteksti dialohu kultur ta oriientatsiieiu na mizhkulturnu komunikatsiiu (Foreign language training of future teachers in the context of cultural dialogue and orientation to intercultural communication)’, Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy, Seriia: Pedahohika, Vyp. 4. Dostupno: <http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vnadped_2015_4_17>. [20 Veresen 2023].