authors: Boris Novikov, Tamara Rudenko, Svitlana Babina
Urgency of the research. G. Skovoroda’s philosophical work attracts the attention of contemporaries because the philosopher puts a person in the spotlight and determines what the support of man in the world is. In this case, the existence of man appears as a process of constant self-creation, self-improvement. The problems of today concern every person, and the opportunity to build a harmonious relationship with the world is the main task for him. The path to happiness, according to the philosopher, lies in self-knowledge and moral perfection of man, so the philosophical wisdom of G. Skovoroda is needed today.
Target setting. The problem of forming a holistic personality and determining the ways of moral improvement of man is still relevant today, and the consideration of G. Skovoroda’s philosophical work in this aspect is quite natural.
Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. This study gave the opportunity to turn to the scientific works of domestic and foreign researchers of the philosophical heritage of G. Skovoroda. The theoretical foundations of the thinker’s work have tried to be found out by many scientists. The works of G. Skovoroda were investigated by D. Bagaliy, V. Gorsky, P. Zhitetsky, I. Ivano, O. Mishanych, I. Mirchuk, K. Mitrovych, A. Nizhenets, D. Olyanchin, I. Pisctry, F. Po-lishchuk, P. Popov, M. Rogovich, I. Taba-chnikov, D. Chizhevsky, V. Shayan, P. Yare-menko and others. G. Skovoroda’s philosophical ideas are explored in the works of modern scientists, first of all, S. Gladky, I. Zagriychuk, D. Kirik, M. Redko, M. Ryk, M. Rogovich, Z. Skrynnik, I. Karivets’, L. Kharchenko.
The research objective. Within the framework of the study it is necessary to analyze the work of G. Skovoroda in aspect of moral improvement of man. Consider the concept “true man” of the philosopher and investigate the connection between the teachings of ancient philosophers, early Christian philosophy, humanists of the Renaissance and the philosophical work of G. Skovoroda that influenced the further development of philosophical thought. It is important to study the understanding and interpretation of the problem of human happiness, which the philosopher considers, the definition of the sense of human being.
The statement of basic materials. G. Skovoroda’s creative work includes many contradictory teachings that originate in ancient and early Christian philosophy, but it is still clear to us that the leading idea of his work is the theme of man, his moral being. G. Skovoroda builds his ideal of a person who has common features with an ancient ideal. The teaching of a philosopher about two natures, which are the basis of the worlds he defined, namely, macrocosm, that is, the universe, microcosm, as projections of the universe, which is a man and a symbolic world that is a Bible for him – resembles the cosmic logos of ancient Greeks with an invisible nature that identifies with God. It appears as a worldwide mind and the law that organize the world, so in the understanding of the philosopher to live in harmony with God means to live in harmony with nature, to find the harmony of the inner world. An important issue for the philosopher is understanding and highlighting the problem of human happiness, which, according to the thinker, can be achieved through the moral improvement of man. The philosopher interprets human life as moral activity, introduces the concept of “related” work, which is based on natural gifts of a person: “if he does work without putting his heart into it he will never be a success”, but if a person lives according to Nature’s law he will certainly be happy [4, p. 11]. The philosopher turns to the Stoic Philosophy and the Bible, which defined his philosophical position – identifying philosophy with ethics, and his task is considered to teach a person to maintain peace of mind in a changing world. Divine will makes a person act in accordance with moral laws, that is how a person can find peace of mind. To build a harmonious relationship with the world, it is important for man to know his nature, self-knowledge. The divine law contained in the Bible, the philosopher believes, encourages man to moral actions. According to the thinker, the knowledge of the symbolic world of the Bible comes through the heart. The figuratively-symbolic world of the Bible cannot be known literally, by reason, it can be understood only by heart. The heart gives the opportunity to distinguish between good and evil, for G. Skovoroda the heart of man is an area of constant struggle of good and evil: “…all worlds consist of two entities: evil and good” [8, p. 154]. G. Skovoroda’s symbolic philosophy has common features with ancient teachings, his symbol images often have several meanings, but he never tried to break the material and spiritual world, but always tried to see spiritual in the material, that is why the symbol of “true” man is formed in the microcosm through a spiritual appeal to God. In his figurative and symbolic worldview every element of the outside world corresponds to the internal and external essence, form and matter, and the main purpose of man, as the thinker believed, is the knowledge of the inner essence of the world in which the truth is hidden “of two entities two thoughts and two hearts: perishable and unperishable, pure and unclean, dead and alive” [8, p. 145]. As L. Ushkalov noted, G. Skovoroda in his works appears to be a philosopher and theologian first of all, he is characterized by a combination of “poetry, philosophy, theology and religious mystical entertainments”, his symbolic way of philosophizing caused “many different, sometimes completely opposite, reasoning and sentences”[11, p. 35-36]. G. Skovoroda’s doctrine is a model of symbolic worldview, the philosopher tried to unite the inner and external human nature, and the divine essence of man can be got not only by mind, but also it can be felt with the heart. Self-knowledge, self-absorption, life in harmony with nature, says the philosopher, provides peace of mind. Realizing the need for self-knowledge, he tries to find the answer to the main questions of ethics, namely, through the specificity of the small world, that is a person, he understands the spiritual foundations of being, outlines his moral and ethical dimensions, considers good and evil, points the path to a “true” person. G. Skovoroda offers the way of moral improvement of man through self-knowledge, following the nature, which will allow man to know himself and turn to God.
Conclusions. Ukrainian philosopher G. Skovoroda is one of those figures of the Ukrainian Baroque culture, whose work does not stop attracting the attention of many modern researchers. Having imagined man as a microcosm, the philosopher emphasizes the active essence of man, which was established by ancient thinkers, was continued by medieval theologians, this idea was supported by the philosophers of the Renaissance, modern times and was leading in the teachings of professors of the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. The theory of “related work” of the philosopher reveals the true purpose of man and points the right path to happiness. The thinker proposes the path of moral improvement of man through self-knowledge, he calls for imitation of nature, for hard work on the formation of a holistic personality, in which the mind and feelings are harmoniously combined. And today the philosophical reflections of G. Skovoroda help understand more deeply existential problems and are a meaningful basis for the development of modern ethical science.
Key words: man, visible and invisible nature, microcosm, universe, logos, idea of “related work”, happiness, self-knowledge, self-improvement, heart of man, moral being, sense of human life.
References:
- Bahalii, DI (1926; 2017), Ukrainskyi mandrovanyi filosof Hr. Sav. Skovoroda (Ukrainian traveling philosopher Gr. Sav. Skovoroda), Kharkiv: Derzh. Vyd-vo Ukrainy, (Kyiv: NBU im. Yaroslava Mudroho, 2017). Dostupno: <https://elib.nlu.org.ua/view.html?&id=8630>. [10 Serpen 2022].
- Verba, HM 2007, ‘Kliuch do khrystyianskoi filosofii Hryhoriia Skovorody (The key to the Christian philosophy of Grigoriy Skovoroda)’. “Skovoroda i Bibliia”. Putivnyk, T. : Aston, 655 c.
- Horbach, N 2002, Nevidomyi Hryhorii Skovoroda (Unknown Hryhoriy Skovoroda). Lviv: Lohos, 152 s.
- Hryhorii Skovoroda: filosofiia zhyttia i tvorchosti “ukrainskoho Sokrata” (Hryhoriy Skovoroda: the philosophy of life and creative work of the “Ukrainian Socrates”) 2019, Nauk.-dopom. Bibliohr. Pokazhch, Kharkiv: Ped. Un-t imeni H.S. Skovorody, nauk. B-ka, uklad. TI Neudachyna; vidp. Red. OH Korobkina, Kharkiv: KhNPU, 128 s.
- Kretov, PV & Kretova, OI 2018, ‘Fihura zamovchuvannia i filosofema pamiati u tvorchosti H.S. Skovorody ta moderna tradytsiia (The figure of silencing and the philosophema of memory in the creative work of H.S. Skovoroda and modern tradition)’. Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu. Seriia “Filosofiia”, № 2, s. 24-31.
- Ryk, MS 2019, Symvolizm u tvorchosti H. Skovorody: relihiieznavchyi analiz (Symbolism in the creative work of H. Skovoroda: religious analysis). Dysertatsiia kandydata filosofskykh nauk, Kyivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, Kyiv, 196 s.
- Skovoroda Hryhorii 2011, Sad bozhestvennykh pisen (Garden of divine songs). Uporiadkuv. Tekstiv, peredm., prym. V. Shevchuka, Kyiv: Natsionalnyi knyzhkovyi proekt, 336 s.
- Skovoroda Hryhorii 2005, Tvory (Writings). U 2-h t, Kyiv: TOV Vydavnytstvo “Oberehy”, 2-e vyd., vyprav. T. 2, 480 s.
- Skovoroda Hryhorii 1972, Povne zibrannia tvoriv u dvokh tomakh (A complete collection of works in two volumes), Kyiv: Naukova dumka, T. 1, 531 s.; T. 2, 574 s.
- Skovoroda, HS 2011, Povna akademichna zbirka tvoriv (A complete academic collection of works). Rohovycha M., za red. Prof. Ushkalova L., Kharkiv-Edmonton-Toronto: Maidan; Vydavnytstvo Kanadskoho Instytutu Ukrainskykh Studii, 1400 s.
- Ushkalov, L 2007, Skovoroda ta inshi: Prychynky do istorii ukrainskoi literatury (Skovoroda and others: Addition for the history of Ukrainian literature), Kyiv: Fakt, 552 s.